[{“box”:0,”content”:”n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
n
Deepak Kumar Yadav, Rajeev Kumar Singh, Arvind Kumar Gupta, Pushpendra Kumar Singh Rathore, Basant Singh Sikarwar
n
- n t
n
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, J.C. Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA, Faridabad Haryana, 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh India, India, India, India, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
nThis work examines the phase change material (P.C.M.) deposited in various lattice formations—such as “S.C., B.C.C., and F.C.C”.—at varied characteristics. The test concentrates on comprehending heat transport properties and thermal activity throughout the “melting and solidification processes”. The heater’s maximum temperature, P.C.M. “melting and solidification”, and Nusselt number are among the essential factors examined. According to the findings, the heater’s maximum temperature drops as porosity increases. Although the Nusselt values for the various lattice forms are similar, the S.C. lattice has a slightly higher Nusselt number. As porosity increases, so are the periods required for melting and solidification. Three essential parameters are predicted using an artificial neural network trained using the Bayesian Regularisation approach. The network’s input parameters are set to porosity and time. When assessing the performance of P.C.M. with three lattice structures, the optimum structure of the ANN demonstrates excellent accuracy. 0.00003601 is the minimal mean square error, while 0.9998 is the most significant correlation coefficient. The trained artificial neural network (ANN) forecasts P.C.M. behaviour with 82% “S.C., B.C.C., and F.C.C”. An exact match between the simulation and the ANN predictions for P.C.M. with 82% porosity lattice structures is found.
n
Keywords: solidification, resistance
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n
nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- Lu et al. Econometrics of the environmental Kuznets curve: testing advancement to carbon intensity-oriented sustainability for eight economic zones in China, J. Clean. Prod. (2021)
- Chen et al.Carbon Kuznets curve in China’s building operations: retrospective and prospective trajectories Sci. Total Environ. (2022)
- Arumugam et al. Air-conditioning cost saving and CO2 emission reduction perspective of buildings designed with P.C.M. integrated blocks and roofs Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments (2021)
- Al-Yasiri et al. Incorporation of phase change materials into building envelope for thermal comfort and energy saving: a comprehensive analysis J. Build. Eng. (2021)
- Hassan et al.Recent advancements in latent heat phase change materials and their applications for thermal energy storage and buildings: a state of the art review Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments (2022)
- A. Lawaget al. Phase change materials for thermal management and energy storage: a review J. Energy Storage (2022)
- Xiong et al. Application of phase change material in improving trombe wall efficiency: an up-to-date and comprehensive overview Energy Build. (2022)
- Wang et al. A critical review on phase change materials (P.C.M.) for sustainable and energy-efficient building: design, characteristic, performance and application Energy Build. (2022)
- K.S. Rathore et al. Enhanced thermophysical properties of organic P.C.M. through shape stabilization for thermal energy storage in buildings: a state of the art review Energy Build. (2021)
- Eanest Jebasingh et al. A comprehensive review on latent heat and thermal conductivity of nanoparticle dispersed phase change material for low-temperature applications Energy Storage Mater. (2020)
- Shamseddine et al. Supercooling of phase change materials: a review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. (2022)
- Li et al. Experimental thermal performance of wallboard with hybrid microencapsulated phase change materials for building application J. Build. Eng. (2020)
- Li et al. Experimental investigation of thermal performance of microencapsulated PCM-contained wallboard by two measurement modes Energy Build. (2019)
- Ben Romdhane et al. A review on thermal energy storage using phase change materials in passive building applications J. Build. Eng. (2020)
- Faraj et al. A review on phase change materials for thermal energy storage in buildings: heating and hybrid applications J. Energy Storage (2021)
- V.S. Dinesh, A. Bhattacharya, Comparison of energy absorption characteristics of PCM-metal foam systems with different pore size distributions, J. Energy Storage 28 (2020), 101190.
- Liu, F. Yang, M. Li, C. Sun, Y. Wu, Development of cost-effective PCM-carbon foam composites for thermal energy storage, Energy Rep. 8 (2022) 1696–1703.
- Pan, Y. Han, J. Lu, Design and optimization of lattice structures: a review, Appl. Sci. 10 (2020) 6374.
- Maconachie, M. Leary, B. Lozanovski, X. Zhang, M. Qian, O. Faruque, M. Brandt, S.L.M. lattice structures: properties, performance, applications and challenges, Mater. Des. 183 (2019), 108137.
- E. Korkmaz, M.K. Gupta, G. Robak, K. Moj, G.M. Krolczyk, M. Funtoglu, Development of lattice structure with selective laser melting process: state of the art on properties, future trends and challenges, J. Manuf. Process. 81 (2022) 1040–1063.
- Sajjad, T. Rehman, M. Ali, C.W. Park, W.M. Yan, Manufacturing and potential applications of lattice structures in thermal systems: a comprehensive review of recent advances, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 198 (2022), 123352.
- Sarabhai, N. Letov, M. Kibsey, F. Sanchez, Y.F. Zhao, Understanding the flow and thermal characteristics of non-stochastic strut-based and surface-based lattice structures, Mater. Des. 227 (2023), 111787.
- Righetti, L. Doretti, C. Zilio, G.A. Longo, S. Mancin, Experimental investigation of phase change of medium/high-temperature paraffin wax embedded in a 3D periodic structure, Int. J. Thermo fluids. 5–6 (2020), 100035.
- Righetti, G. Savio, R. Meneghello, L. Doretti, S. Mancin, Experimental study of phase change material (P.C.M.) embedded in 3D periodic structures realized via additive manufacturing, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 153 (2020), 106376.
- Piacquadio, M. Schirp-Schoenen, M. Mameli, S. Filippeschi, K.U. Schroder, Experimental analysis of a phase change material’s thermal energy storage potential embedded in additively manufactured lattice structures, Appl. Therm. Eng. 216 (2022), 119091.
- Zhou, Z. Hu, D. Wang, H. Wu, Visualized-experimental investigation on the melting performance of P.C.M. in 3D printed metal foam, Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 31 (2022), 101298.
- Hu, X. Gong, Experimental and numerical investigation on thermal performance enhancement of phase change material embedding porous metal structure with cubic cell, Appl. Therm. Eng. 175 (2020), 115337.
- Hu, X. Gong, Experimental study on the thermal response of PCM-based heat sink using structured porous material fabricated by 3D printing, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 24 (2021), 1000844.
- Hu, X. Gong, Pore-scale numerical simulation of the thermal performance for phase change material embedded in metal foam with cubic periodic cell structure, Appl. Therm. Eng. 151 (2019) 231–239.
- Diani, C. Nonino, L. Rossetto, Melting of phase change materials inside periodic cellular structures fabricated by additive manufacturing: experimental results and numerical simulations, Appl. Therm. Eng. 215 (2022), 118969
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
| Volume | ||
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | ||
| Received | March 22, 2024 | |
| Accepted | May 11, 2024 | |
| Published | June 28, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }nn”}]