Kum Gwon Choe
Yu Mi Sin
Sol Song Pak
Ji Yong Ri
Jong Gil Pak
- Faculty Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea North Korea Korea
- Faculty Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea North Korea Korea
- Faculty Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea North Korea Korea
- Faculty Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea North Korea Korea
- Faculty Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea North Korea Korea
Abstract
The geometric complication caused by the “rings” and “sails” used to make the parachutist’s canopy provides a considerable computationally problem, which is the focus of this paper’s fluid–structure interaction (FSI) modeling of ringsail parachutes. Based on the sustained space-time FSI (SSTFSI) method, we have developed an FSI simulation of ringsail jumping devices. The FSI Geometric Smoothing Technique and the Homogenized Modeling of Geometric Porosity represent a pair of the above interface projection methods. We outline our use of one of these supplemental methods to ringsail parachutes in FSI simulations. We consider a single primary parachute in the simulations we give here, which carries one-third of the overall vehicle’s entire burden. Researchers show the findings from FSI simulation of unloading, that involve drifting under cross wind influence and, as a specific instance, losing warmth shielding.
Keywords: Ringsail parachute, Orion space vehicle, fluid–structure interaction, offloading, drifting
[This article belongs to Journal of Experimental & Applied Mechanics(joeam)]
References
- Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26:27–36Comput Mech (2008) 43:133–142,141
- Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S (1994) Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 119:157–177
- Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1994) Massively parallel finite element computation of incompressible flows involving fluid–body interactions. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 112:253–282
- Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows—Fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 21:933–953
- Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1999) Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations. Computat Mech 23:130–143
- Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 190:321–332
- Stein K, Benney R, Kalro V, Tezduyar TE, Leonard J, Accorsi M(2000) Parachute fluid–structure interactions: 3-D computation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 190:373–386
- Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 191:717–726
- Ohayon R (2001) Reduced symmetric models for modal analysis of internal structural-acoustic and hydroelastic-sloshing systems. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 190:3009–3019
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2004) Space–time techniques for finite element computation of flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Gallegos S, Herrera I, Botello S, Zarate F, Ayala G (eds) Proceedings of the III international congress on numerical methods in engineering and applied science, CD-ROM, Monterrey, Mexico
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2004) Influence of wall elasticity on image-based blood flow simulation. Jpn Soc Mech Eng J Ser A 70:1224–1231 (in Japanese)
- van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2005) On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluid–structure interaction problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 27:599–621
- Michler C, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2005) An interface Newton–Krylov solver for fluid–structure interaction. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 47:1189–1195
- Gerbeau J-F, Vidrascu M, Frey P (2005) Fluid–structure interaction in blood flow on geometries based on medical images. Comp Struc 83:155–165
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions.Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:2002–2027
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006) Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time formulations. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:5743–5753
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid–structure interactions with the Deforming-Spatial-Domain/Stabilized Space–Time formulation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:1885–1895
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K, Aureli L (2006) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time techniques. In: Bungartz H-J, Schafer M (eds) Fluid–structure interaction, vol 53. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 50–81
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Comput Mech 38:482–490
- Dettmer W, Peric D (2006) A computational framework for fluid–structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:5754–5779
- Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322
- Khurram RA, Masud A (2006) A multiscale/stabilized formulation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations for moving boundary flows and fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 38: 403–416
- Kuttler U, Forster C, Wall WA (2006) A solution for the incompressibility dilemma in partitioned fluid–structure interaction with pure Dirichlet fluid domains. Comput Mech 38:417–429
- Lohner R, Cebral JR, Yang C, Baum JD, Mestreau EL, Soto O(2006) Extending the range of applicability of the loose coupling approach for FSI simulations. In: Bungartz H-J, Schafer M (eds)Fluid–structure interaction, vol 53. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 82–100
- Bletzinger K-U, Wuchner R, Kupzok A (2006) Algorithmic treatment of shells and free form-membranes in FSI. In: Bungartz H-J, Schafer M (eds) Fluid–structure interaction, vol 53. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, Springer, Heidelberg,pp 336–355
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE(2007) Influence of wall elasticity in patient-specific hemodynamic Comp Fluids 36:160–168
- Masud A, Bhanabhagvanwala M, Khurram RA (2007) An adaptive mesh rezoning scheme for moving boundary flows and fluid–structure interaction. Comp Fluids 36:77–91
- Sawada T, Hisada T (2007) Fuid–structure interaction analysis of the two dimensional flag-in-wind problem by an interface tracking ALE finite element method. Comp Fluids 36:136–146
- Wall WA, Genkinger S, Ramm E (2007) A strong coupling partitioned approach for fluid–structure interaction with free surfaces. Comp Fluids 36:169–183
- Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) A fully-integrated approach to fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech (in preparation)
- Stein KR, Benney RJ, Kalro V, Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1997) Parallel computation of parachute fluid–structure interactions. In: Proceedings of AIAA 14th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, AIAA paper 97-1505, San Francisco
- Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44
- Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space–time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 94:339–351
- Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space–time procedure: Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 94:353–371
- Tezduyar TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 43:555–575
- Hughes TJR, Brooks AN (1979) A multi-dimensional upwind scheme with no crosswind diffusion. In: Hughes TJR (ed) Finite element methods for convection dominated flows, AMD-vol 34.ASME, New York, pp 19–35
- Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259
- Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comp Meth Appl MechEng 95:221–242 123 142 Comput Mech (2008) 43:133–142
- Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Balestra M (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuška–Brezzi condition: a stable Petrov–Galerkin formulation of the Stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 59:85–99
- Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA (1992) Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods space–time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel In: New methods in transient analysis, PVP-vol246/AMD-vol 143, ASME, New York, pp l7–24
- Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94
- Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1997) Parallel computation of incompressible flows with complex geometries. Int J Numer Meth Fluids24:1321–1340
- Tezduyar T (2001) Finite element interface-tracking and interface capturing techniques for flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Proceedings of the ASME symposium on fluid-physics and heat transfer for macro- and micro-scale gas–liquid and phase-change flows (CD-ROM), ASME paper IMECE2001/HTD-24206,ASME, New York
- Tezduyar TE (2003) Stabilized finite element formulations and interface-tracking and interface-capturing techniques for incompressible flows. In: Hafez MM (ed) Numerical simulations of incompressible flows. World Scientific, New Jersey, pp 221–239
- Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid–structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70:58–63
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Senga M, Aureli L, Stein K, Griffin B (2005) Finite element modeling of fluid–structure interactions with space–time and advanced mesh update techniques. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on numerical methods in continuum mechanics (CD-ROM), Zilina, Slovakia
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 54:855–900
- Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1992) A finite element study of incompressible flows past oscillating cylinders and aerofoils. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 15:1073–1118
- Stein K, Benney R, Tezduyar T, Kalro V, Leonard J, Accorsi M (1999) 3-D computation of parachute fluid–structure interactions: performance and control. In: Proceedings of CEAS/AIAA 15th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, AIAA paper 99-1714, Toulouse, France
- Stein K, Benney R, Tezduyar T, Kalro V, Potvin J, Bretl T (1999) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of a cross parachute: comparison of numerical predictions with wind tunnel data. In: Proceedings of CEAS/AIAA 15th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, AIAA Paper 99-1725, Toulouse, France
- Stein K, Benney R, Tezduyar T, Potvin J (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a cross parachute: numerical simulation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 191:673–687
- Stein KR, Benney RJ, Tezduyar TE, Leonard JW, Accorsi ML (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a round parachute: modeling and simulation techniques. J Aircraft 38:800–808
- Tezduyar TE (2003) Stabilized finite element methods for flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. HERMIS Int J Comp Math Appl 4:63–88
- Tezduyar TE (2004) Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Stein E, De Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, vol 3. Fluids, Chap 17. Wiley, New York
- Tezduyar TE (2004) Moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Franca LP, Tezduyar TE, Masud A (eds) Finite element methods: 1970’s and beyond, CIMNE, Barcelona, pp 205–220
- Tezduyar TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: special methods and enhanced solution techniques. Comp Fluids 36:207–223
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Cragin T, Nanna B, Conklin BS, Pausewang J, Schwaab M (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: arterial fluid Int J Numer Meth Fluids 54:901–922
- Tezduyar TE, Pausewang J, Sathe S (2007) FSI modeling of sails. In: Onate E, Garcia J, Bergan P, Kvamsdal T (eds) Marine 2007, CIMNE, Barcelona
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin BS (2007) Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space–time fluid–structure interaction technique. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. DOI:10. 1002/fld.1633
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Crabtree J, Christopher J (2007) Air–fabric interaction modeling with the stabilized space–time FSI technique. In: Proceedings of the third Asian-Pacific congress on computational mechanics (CD-ROM), Kyoto
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0261-7
- Saad Y, Schultz M (1986) GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7:856–869
- Karypis G, Kumar V (1998) A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J Sci Comput 20:359–392
Journal of Experimental & Applied Mechanics
Volume | 15 |
Issue | 01 |
Received | April 23, 2024 |
Accepted | May 25, 2024 |
Published | June 14, 2024 |