[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]
Open Access
n
[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
- n t
n
Tejasvi Arneja, Tejasvi Arneja
[/foreach]
n
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Student, Student, Department of Automation and Robotics, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha New Delhi, Department of Automation and Robotics, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha New Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, India, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn
Abstract
nIn many engineering applications, connection by welding are essential to the structural integrity of steel components. However, because of the intricate interplay between material qualities, welding techniques, and structural stress conditions, evaluating the dependability and safety of these welded connections continues to be a difficult challenge. A systematic framework that evaluates the behavior of cracks and faults in welded joints is provided by fracture mechanics, which also offers insights into the initiation, propagation, and determination of critical flaw size. The assessment methods for welded joints in structural steel components that are based on fracture mechanics are thoroughly reviewed and analyzed in this research paper. There includes discussion of several experimental, computational, and analytical techniques for fatigue gauges, crack growth analysis, and fracture toughness characterisation. Moreover, case studies and application examples show how useful fracture mechanics-based methods are for improving our comprehension and ability to predict the behavior of welded joints, which in turn leads to better practices for welding steel structure maintenance, scrutiny, and design.
n
Keywords: Welding, steel, skyscrapers, fracture mechanics, crack growth
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Fracture Mechanics and Damage Science(ijfmds)]
n
n
n
n
n
n
n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] nn
n[if 379 not_equal=””]nBrowse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- Carpinteri, Andrea, Camilla Ronchei, Daniela Scorza and Sabrina Vantadori. “Fracture mechanics based approach to fatigue analysis of welded joints.” Eng Fail Anal 49 (2015): 67–78.
- Skoglund, Oskar and John Leander. “Initial parameters to estimate the fatigue strength of welded structures using a fracture mechanical model.” Eng Struct 260 (2022): 114185.
- Rice, J.R. Fracture Mechanics. Appl. Mech. Rev. 1985, 38, 1271.
- Chandran, K.R. A physically based universal functional to characterize the mechanism of fatigue crack growth in materials. Mater.2015, 107, 115–118.
- Gao, H.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, C.-Q. A modified normalization method for determining fracture toughness of steel. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2021, 44, 568–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szymczak, T.; Makowska, K.; Kowalewski, Z.L. Influence of the Welding Process on the Mechanical Characteristics and Fracture of the S700MC High Strength Steel under Various Types of Loading. Materials2020, 13, 5249.
- Kinki, A.I. Reconnaissance Re-Port on Damage of Steel Building Structures Observed from the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Hanshin/Awaji) Earthquake; Steel Committee of Kinki Branch: Osaka, Japan, 1995.
- ASTM E23. Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2008.
- Newman Jr. J. C., Raju I. S.: Stress intensity factor equations for cracks in three-dimensional finite bodies subjected to tension and bending loads, NASA Technical Memorandum 85793, 1984.
- Minami F., Ochiai T., Hashida T., Arimochi K., Konda N.: Local approach to dynamic fracture toughness evaluation, ASTM STP 1389, Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, American Society for Testing and Materials, 2000, Vol. 31, pp. 271–304.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
International Journal of Fracture Mechanics and Damage Science
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | 01 | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | 02 | |
| Received | April 8, 2024 | |
| Accepted | April 16, 2024 | |
| Published | May 6, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]