A Review of Recent Advancements in the Field of Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar Joints Made of Aluminium and Magnesium

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]

n

Open Access

n

[/if 992]n

n

Year : April 22, 2024 at 4:51 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

    n t

    [foreach 286]n

    n

    P J Lokesh Kumar, S Shankaranarayanan, C Jayabalan, S D Sekar, K Sengottaiyan, R Suresh Kumar

  1. [/foreach]

    n

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.M.K. Engineering College, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Velammal Engineering College, Department of Mechanical Engineering, AMET University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.M.K. Engineering College, Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.M.K. Engineering College, Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.M.K. Engineering College,, , India, India, India, India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn

n

Abstract

nFriction stir welding (FSW) stands at the forefront of welding technology, offering a promising avenue for joining dissimilar metals like aluminum and magnesium. These metals, renowned for their exceptional properties such as ductility, thermal conductivity, low density, and impressive weight-to-strength ratios, find wide utility across numerous industrial sectors. However, traditional fusion welding methods often struggle to effectively join aluminum and magnesium due to their disparate physical and chemical characteristics. FSW circumvents these challenges by employing a solid-state welding approach, utilizing frictional heat generated between a rotating tool and the workpieces to create a robust bond without melting the metals. This method sidesteps common issues encountered in fusion welding, such as solidification cracking, porosity, and distortion. In the context of aluminum-magnesium joints, understanding and optimizing FSW process parameters are crucial for achieving desired mechanical properties and mitigating defects. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of FSW for joining aluminum to magnesium, delving into key aspects such as process parameters, mechanical properties of the joints, and common defects encountered during welding. By elucidating these critical factors, researchers and engineers can enhance the quality and reliability of FSW-produced aluminum-magnesium joints, thereby unlocking new possibilities for lightweight, high-performance structures in industries ranging from automotive and aerospace to marine and construction. As FSW technology continues to evolve, its potential for revolutionizing metal joining processes across diverse applications remains both compelling and exciting.

n

n

n

Keywords: Magnesium, Aluminium, Friction stir welding, solid state welding, welding defect

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: P J Lokesh Kumar, S Shankaranarayanan, C Jayabalan, S D Sekar, K Sengottaiyan, R Suresh Kumar , A Review of Recent Advancements in the Field of Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar Joints Made of Aluminium and Magnesium jopc April 22, 2024; :-

n

How to cite this URL: P J Lokesh Kumar, S Shankaranarayanan, C Jayabalan, S D Sekar, K Sengottaiyan, R Suresh Kumar , A Review of Recent Advancements in the Field of Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar Joints Made of Aluminium and Magnesium jopc April 22, 2024 {cited April 22, 2024};:-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=April 22, 2024/view=0

n


n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] nn

n[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

nn

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. R. Muhamad et al., Effects of Al-Ni powder addition on dissimilar friction stir welding between AA7075-T6 and 304 L, Materwiss. Werksttech., vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1274–1284, 2020, doi: 10.1002/mawe.201900105.
  2. Zhang, Y. Shen, Y. Yan, R. Guo, W. Guan, and G. Guo, Microstructure characterization and mechanical behavior of dissimilar friction stir welded Al/Cu couple with different joint configurations, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 94, no. 1–4, pp. 1021–1030, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0961-2.
  3. R. bin Muhamad et al., Enhancements on dissimilar friction stir welding between AZ31 and SPHC mild steel with Al-Mg as powder additives, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME, vol. 143, no. 7, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1115/1.4049745.
  4. Itoh, M. J. Bröcker, S. I. Sekine, D. Söll, and S. Yokoyama, Dimer-dimer interaction of the bacterial selenocysteine synthase sela promotes functional active-site formation and catalytic specificity, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 426, no. 8, pp. 1723–1735, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.01.003.
  5. A. Shehabeldeen, Y. Yin, X. Ji, X. Shen, Z. Zhang, and J. Zhou, Investigation of the microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms of dissimilar friction stir welded aluminium/titanium joints, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 11, pp. 507–518, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.026.
  6. Cui, H. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Zhang, and J. Ko, Design of lightweight multi-material automotive bodies using new material performance indices of thin-walled beams for the material selection with crashworthiness consideration, Mater. Des., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 815–821, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.018.
  7. Schubert, M. Klassen, I. Zerner, C. Walz, and G. Sepold, Light-weight structures produced by laser beam joining for future applications in automobile and aerospace industry, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00756-7.
  8. Heidarzadeh et al., Friction stir welding/processing of metals and alloys: A comprehensive review on microstructural evolution, Progress in Materials Science, vol. 117. Elsevier Ltd, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100752.
  9. P. Singh, S. K. Patel, A. Ranjan, and B. Kuriachen, Recent research progress in solid state friction-stir welding of aluminium–magnesium alloys: A critical review, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 6217–6256, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.008.
  10. M. El-Sayed, A. Y. Shash, M. Abd-Rabou, and M. G. ElSherbiny, Welding and processing of metallic materials by using friction stir technique: A review, J. Adv. Join. Process., vol. 3, no. January, p. 100059, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jajp.2021.100059.
  11. Verma, S. Ahmed, and P. Saha, Challenges, process requisites/inputs, mechanics and weld performance of dissimilar micro-friction stir welding (dissimilar μFSW): A comprehensive review, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 68, no. PA, pp. 249–276, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.045.
  12. Banik, A. Saha, J. Deb Barma, U. Acharya, and S. C. Saha, Determination of best tool geometry for friction stir welding of AA 6061-T6 using hybrid PCA-TOPSIS optimization method, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 173, p. 108573, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108573.
  13. Li, Y. Shen, W. Hou, and Y. Qi, Friction stir welding of Ti-6Al-4V alloy: Friction tool, microstructure, and mechanical properties, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 58, no. May, pp. 344–354, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.025.
  14. Rai, A. De, H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, and T. DebRoy, Review: Friction stir welding tools, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 325–342, 2011, doi: 10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000023.
  15. Fujii, L. Cui, M. Maeda, and K. Nogi, Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 419, no. 1–2, pp. 25–31, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.045.
  16. Xue, D. R. Ni, D. Wang, B. L. Xiao, and Z. Y. Ma, Effect of friction stir welding parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the dissimilar Al-Cu joints, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 528, no. 13–14, pp. 4683–4689, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.067.
  17. Hou et al., Enhancing metallurgical and mechanical properties of friction stir butt welded joints of Al–Cu via cold sprayed Ni interlayer, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 809, no. November 2020, p. 140992, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.140992.
  18. Mastanaiah, G. M. Reddy, and A. Sharma, Evolution and current practices in friction stir welding tool design. Elsevier Inc., 2021. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822049-8.00006-2.
  19. Sahlot and A. Arora, Numerical model for prediction of tool wear and worn-out pin profile during friction stir welding, Wear, vol. 408–409, pp. 96–107, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2018.05.007.
  20. Du, T. Mukherjee, P. Mitra, and T. DebRoy, Machine learning based hierarchy of causative variables for tool failure in friction stir welding, Acta Mater., vol. 192, pp. 67–77, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.047.
  21. H. Shah, S. Walbridge, and A. Gerlich, Tool eccentricity in friction stir welding: A comprehensive review, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 566–578, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13621718.2019.1573010.
  22. Wang, Y. Pan, and D. A. Lados, Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar Al/Al and Al/Non-Al Alloys: A Review, Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 2097–2117, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11663-018-1290-z.
  23. Zhang, G. Huang, Y. Cao, Q. Li, L. Niu, and Q. Liu, Characterizations of microstructure, crystallographic texture and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welding joints for AA2024 and AA7075 under different tool shoulder end profiles, Mater. Today Commun., vol. 25, no. July, p. 101435, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101435.
  24. Shi, C. S. Wu, and L. Fu, Effects of tool shoulder size on the thermal process and material flow behaviors in ultrasonic vibration enhanced friction stir welding, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 53, no. November 2019, pp. 69–83, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.002.
  25. Trueba, G. Heredia, D. Rybicki, and L. B. Johannes, Effect of tool shoulder features on defects and tensile properties of friction stir welded aluminum 6061-T6, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 219, pp. 271–277, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.12.027.
  26. Chu, S. J. Hao, W. Y. Li, X. W. Yang, Y. F. Zou, and D. Wu, Impact of shoulder morphology on macrostructural forming and the texture development during probeless friction stir spot welding, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 12, pp. 2042–2054, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.013.
  27. K. MUGADA and K. ADEPU, Effect of knurling shoulder design with polygonal pins on material flow and mechanical properties during friction stir welding of Al–Mg–Si alloy, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2281–2289, 2019, doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65134-4.
  28. Garg and A. Bhattacharya, Strength and failure analysis of similar and dissimilar friction stir spot welds: Influence of different tools and pin geometries, Mater. Des., vol. 127, pp. 272–286, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.084.
  29. Kaushik and D. K. Dwivedi, Effect of tool geometry in dissimilar Al-Steel Friction Stir Welding, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 68, no. May, pp. 198–208, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.007.
  30. Ni, L. Fu, Z. Shen, and X. C. Liu, Role of tool design on thermal cycling and mechanical properties of a high-speed micro friction stir welded 7075-T6 aluminum alloy, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 48, no. September, pp. 145–153, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.025.
  31. M. Sadoun, A. Wagih, A. Fathy, and A. R. S. Essa, Effect of tool pin side area ratio on temperature distribution in friction stir welding, Results Phys., vol. 15, no. November, p. 102814, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102814.
  32. Zhou, R. X. Zhang, G. H. Li, W. L. Zhou, Y. X. Huang, and X. G. Song, Effect of pin profile on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir spot welded Al-Cu dissimilar metals, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 36, no. September, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.017.
  33. F. X. Muthu and V. Jayabalan, Tool travel speed effects on the microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum-copper joints, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 217, pp. 105–113, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.007.
  34. Wei, J. Li, J. Xiong, and F. Zhang, Effect of tool pin insertion depth on friction stir lap welding of aluminum to stainless steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 3005–3013, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11665-013-0595-y.
  35. Chitturi, S. R. Pedapati, and M. Awang, Effect of tilt angle and pin depth on dissimilar friction stir lap welded joints of aluminum and steel alloys, Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma122333901.
  36. Cao and M. Jahazi, Effect of tool rotational speed and probe length on lap joint quality of a friction stir welded magnesium alloy, Mater. Des., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.048.
  37. Guan, H. Zhang, H. Liu, Q. Gao, M. Gong, and F. Qu, Structure-property characteristics of Al-Cu joint formed by high-rotation-speed friction stir lap welding without tool penetration into lower Cu sheet, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 57, no. May, pp. 363–369, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.001.
  38. Bisadi, A. Tavakoli, M. Tour Sangsaraki, and K. Tour Sangsaraki, The influences of rotational and welding speeds on microstructures and mechanical properties of friction stir welded Al5083 and commercially pure copper sheets lap joints, Mater. Des., vol. 43, pp. 80–88, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.029.
  39. W. Tan, Z. G. Jiang, L. Q. Li, Y. B. Chen, and X. Y. Chen, Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of dissimilar Al-Cu joints produced by friction stir welding, Mater. Des., vol. 51, pp. 466–473, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.056.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Open Access Review Article

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Polymer and Composites

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2321–2810[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 2146 equals=”Yes”]

[/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”]

[/if 2146]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received February 28, 2024
Accepted March 7, 2024
Published April 22, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n

nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]