[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]
Open Access
n
[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
- n t
n
Megha Vanasi
[/foreach]
n
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- , , ,
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn
Abstract
nThe ubiquitous presence of sugar in our daily diet poses a considerable impact on both dental and overall health. The consensus is clear: an excess of sugar is far from ideal. Moreover, controversial conjectures have emerged, suggesting a pivotal role of excessive sugar intake in certain degenerative diseases. In response to these concerns, artificial sweeteners, also known as sugar substitutes or low-calorie sweeteners, have become increasingly appealing to consumers.Artificial sweeteners, characterized by their non-nutritive nature and high-intensity sweetness, offer a viable alternative to traditional sugar-laden products. These substitutes present an opportunity for individuals to indulge in the sweetness they crave without compromising dental health or overall well-being. Their role in the food industry is pivotal, granting manufacturers the ability to craft a diverse array of palatable sweet foods and beverages. Importantly, the availability of a variety of safe sugar substitutes proves beneficial for consumers, allowing for the enjoyment of sweet flavors while prioritizing oral hygiene and general health.In navigating the complex landscape of dietary choices, the adoption of artificial sweeteners emerges as a pragmatic approach to strike a balance between satisfying sweet cravings and maintaining a health-conscious lifestyle. As research continues to unfold, the consumption of these sugar substitutes represents a contemporary solution to the age-old challenge of reconciling taste preferences with health considerations
n
Keywords: Sugar, Sugar Substitute, Oral Health, Dental Caries
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry(rrjod)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[else] nvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue == ‘indexingbodies’) {n document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘);n }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘administrator’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘rrjod’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }n else { document.write(‘ ‘); }n [/if 992] [if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- Yadav P, Kaur B, Srivastava R, Srivastava S. Sugar substitute and health. J Dent Med Sci 2014;13:68-75.
- Weihrauch MR, Diehl V. Artificial sweeteners – Do they bear a carcinogenic risk? Ann Oncol 2004;15:1460-5
- Tandel KR. Sugar substitutes: Health controversy over perceived benefits. AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs 1998;16:42-9.
- Kroger M, Meister K, Kava R. Low calories sweeteners & other sugar substitutes: A review of the safety issues. J Indin Dent Assoc 2006;5:24-5
- Mackie IC. Children’s dental health and medicines that contain sugar. BMJ 1995;15:141-2.
- Bentley EM, Mackie IC. A qualitative investigation into general practitioners’ views on prescribing sugar-free medicines for children prior to a dental health education campaign. Health Educ Res 1993;8:519-24
- Bellisle F, Drewnowski A. Intense sweeteners, energy intake and the control of body weight. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007;61:691-700.
- The Potential Toxicity of Artificial Sweeteners by Christina R. Whitehouse, BSN, RN, Joseph Boullata, PharmD, RPh, BCNSP, and Linda A. McCauley, PhD, RN, FAAN, FAAOHN. AAOHN Journal. june 2008, vol. 56, no. 6.
- Whitehouse CR, Boullata J, McCauley LA. The potential toxicity of artificial sweeteners. AAOHN J 2008;56:251-9.
- Donnell KO, Kearsley MW. Sweeteners and sugar alternative in food technology. ABNF J 2009;2:34-48
- Ranjan R, Jaiswal J, Jeena J. Stevia as a natural sweetener. Int J Res Pharm Chem 2011;1:21-9
- Frostell G, Keyes PH, Larson RH. Effect of various sugars and sugar substitutes on dental caries in hamsters and rats. J Nutr 1967;93:65-76
- Scheinin A, Bánóczy J. Xylitol and caries: the collaborative WHO oral disease preventive programme in Hungary. Int Dent J 1985;35:50-7
- Peter L, Anna H, Ingegerd M, Svante T. Effect of various mouth-rinses on caries reduction. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:21-9
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | |
| Received | February 6, 2024 |
| Accepted | February 9, 2024 |
| Published |
n
n
n
n
n
nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]