Abhishek Sharma,
Mandeep Singh,
Mohit Srivastava,
Pradeep Kumar Gaur,
Gagandeep Kaur,
Priyanka Sood,
Dinesh Kumar,
- Associate Professor Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Chandigarh Engineering College (CEC-CGC), Landran Punjab India
- Associate Professor Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Chandigarh Engineering College (CEC-CGC), Landran Punjab India
- Associate Professor Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Chandigarh Engineering College (CEC-CGC), Landran Punjab India
- Associate Professor Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Chandigarh Engineering College (CEC-CGC), Landran Punjab India
- Associate Professor Electronics & Communication Engineering Department, Chandigarh Engineering College (CEC-CGC), Landran Punjab India
- Associate Professor Electronics & Communication Engineering Department KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh India
- Associate Professor Electronics & Communication Engineering Department KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh India
Abstract
Natural phenomena including weathering, erosion, volcanic eruptions, and plate tectonics, as well as human activities like agriculture, deforestation, and urbanization, cause the Earth’s surface to change continuously. In many different applications, such as environmental monitoring, disaster management, urban planning, agriculture and forestry, climate change studies, resource management, and infrastructure monitoring, it may be extremely beneficial to detect and track these changes. There are various algorithms and methods proposed by many researchers which can detect the change by comparing the images captured at different times. In this paper, a comparison of various change detection methods using images processing has been made and their performance has been compared on the basis of various parameters like accuracy, kappa coefficients, false alarms etc. Change detection in high-resolution photos has drawn a lot of interest because it can be used in a variety of scenarios, including environmental monitoring, urban planning, and disaster relief. A comparison of several change detection techniques applied to high-resolution images is presented in this article. We explore the workings, elements, and uses of different approaches, emphasising their advantages and disadvantages. A thorough conclusion on the best use of each strategy is provided after providing insights into the efficiency of these techniques in various settings in the discussion section.
Keywords: Discrete wavelet transform, Climate change, kappa coefficients, discrete wavelet transform, Image Clustering Method.
[This article belongs to Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS(jorsg)]
References
- J. Radke, et al., “Image Change Detection Algorithms: A Systematic Survey,” IEEE Transaction on. Image Processing, vol/issue: 14(3), pp. 294–307, 2005.
- A Singh, “Digital Change Detection Techniques Using Remotely Sensed Data,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol/issue: 10(6), pp. 989-1003, 1989.
- Sharma and T. Gulati, “Review of Change Detection Techniques for Remotely Sensed Images,” International Journal of computer Science and Engineering, vol/issue: 5(1), pp. 22-25, 2017.
- Zhang and X. Cao, “A Way of Image Fusion Based on Wavelet Transform,” IEEE 9th International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks, Dalian, pp. 498-501, 2013.
- Gong, et al., “Change Detection in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Based on Image Fusion and Fuzzy Clustering,” IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, vol/issue: 21(4), pp. 2141-2151, 2012.
- Beaulieu, et al., “Multi- Spectral Image Resolution Refinement Using Stationary Wavelet Transform,” IGARSS 2003, 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol. 6, pp. 4032-4034, 2003.
- Saranya G. and S. N. Devi, “Performance Evaluation for Image Fusion Technique in Medical Images Using Spatial and Transform Method,” International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking, Chennai, pp. 446-450, 2016.
- Borwonwatanadelok, et al., “Multi Focus Image Fusion Based on Stationary Wavelet Transform and Extended Spatial Frequency Measurement,” IEEE Transaction on Electronic Computer Technology, pp. 77-81, 2009.
- Shi and M. Fang, “Multi-focus Color Image Fusion Based on SWT and IHS,” Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Haikou, pp. 461-465, 2007.
- K. Kumar, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Using DWT and SWT by Fusion Techniques with Watermarking,” IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, Coimbatore, pp. 1-5, 2014.
- E. Fowler, “The Redundant Discrete Wavelet Transform and Additive Noise,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing Letters, vol. 12, pp. 629-632, 2005.
- N. Jamaluddin, et al., “Performance of DWT and SWT in Muscle Fatigue Detection,” IEEE Student Symposium in Biomedical Engineering & Sciences, Shah Alam, pp. 50-53, 2015.
- Li and Y. Wang, “Biological Image Fusion Using A SWT Based Variable-Weights Selection Scheme,” 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Beijing, pp. 1-4, 2009.
- C. Dunn, “A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters,” Journal of Cybernetics, vol. 3, pp. 32-57, 1973.
- C. Bezdek, “Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function,” New York, Plenum, 1981.
- Gong, et al., “A Neighbourhood Based Ratio Approach for Change Detection in SAR Images,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol/issue: 9(2), pp. 307-311, 2012.
Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Received | June 15, 2024 |
| Accepted | July 15, 2024 |
| Published | August 17, 2024 |