Cultural Geomorphological Investigation of the Area around Twelve Jyotirlinga in India

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : June 13, 2024 at 4:02 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume :15 [else] Volume :15[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : 01 | Page : 47-70

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Kuldeep Pareta, Upasana Pareta

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Manager, Senior consultant DHI (India) Water & Environment Pvt Ltd., Omaksh Consulting Pvt Ltd., Greater, Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar New Delhi, Uttar Pradesh India, India

    2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThe cultural geomorphological investigation of the area around the twelve Jyotirlinga in India presents a comprehensive scientific exploration of the geological and geomorphological aspects of these sacred sites. Originally believed to be 64 in number, the twelve Jyotirlinga represent the most revered and holy places dedicated to Lord Shiva. These temples, distributed across the Indian subcontinent, exhibit a remarkable geographical arrangement in a distinctive spiral pattern. Based on aerial positions of Jyotirlinga, authors have identified a unique geometric pattern which is similar to octahedral shape. This study delves into the geological composition of the regions surrounding each Jyotirlinga, revealing intriguing correlations between their locations and rock types. Geomorphic analysis conveys that each temple’s placement within a distinct geomorphic setting holds symbolic significance in Vedic science, aligning with the multifaceted attributes of Lord Shiva. Through hypsometric analysis, it categorizes the developmental stages of their respective micro-watersheds, shedding light on the dynamic landscape evolution. The significance of this research extends beyond its scientific value. It uncovers the geological diversity encapsulated within India’s spiritual heritage, enriching our understanding of the intersection between culture and geomorphology. Furthermore, the study acknowledges the susceptibility of these regions to natural disasters, exemplified by the Kedarnath floods in 2013 and the Rameswaram tsunami in 2004, emphasizing the need for robust disaster management strategies. This investigation not only advances the field of geomorphology but also fosters an enriched appreciation of the profound cultural and geological tapestry woven around the Twelve Jyotirlinga, bridging science and spirituality.

n

n

n

Keywords: Geology, geomorphology, topography, hypsometric, octahedron shape, Jyotirlinga

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS(jorsg)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS(jorsg)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Kuldeep Pareta, Upasana Pareta. Cultural Geomorphological Investigation of the Area around Twelve Jyotirlinga in India. Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS. May 10, 2024; 15(01):47-70.

n

How to cite this URL: Kuldeep Pareta, Upasana Pareta. Cultural Geomorphological Investigation of the Area around Twelve Jyotirlinga in India. Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS. May 10, 2024; 15(01):47-70. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jorsg/article=May 10, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]

[/if 992]n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]

n

nn[/if 992]nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Ahnert, F. (1988). Modelling landform change. In M. G. Anderson (Ed.), Modelling geomorphological systems (pp. 375–400). Wiley.
  2. Allison, D. T. (2015). Structural geology laboratory manual (fourth edition). Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama. https://www.southalabama.edu/
    geography/allison/GY403/StructuralGeologyLabManual.pdf
  3. Arora, S. (2023). Kedarnath temple: a spiritual journey amidst the Himalayas. Adda247. https://currentaffairs.adda247.com/kedarnath-temple-a-spiritual-journey-amidst-the-himalayas/.
  4. Bharati, A. (1963). Pilgrimage in the Indian tradition. History of Religions, 3(1), 135–167. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1062081.
  5. Burrough, P. A., van Gaans, P. F. M., & MacMillan, R. A. (2000). High resolution landform classification using fuzzy k-means. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113(1), 37–52.
  6. Collins, N., & Kreiner, N. (2010). The geography of pilgrimage and tourism: transformations and implications for applied geography. Applied Geography, 30(1), 153-164.
  7. Cooke, R., Warren, A., & Goudie, A. (1993). Desert geomorphology. UCL Press: London.
  8. Cracknell, M. J., & Reading, A. M. (2014). Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit. Computers & Geosciences, 63, 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.008.
  9. Curran, S. (2006). The role of sacred natural sites and cultural landscapes. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2006–053.pdf
  10. Das, S. (2019). The real meaning of the Shiva’s Linga symbol. Learn Religions, Dotdash Meredith. https://www.learnreligions.com/what-is-shiva-linga-1770455.
  11. Dramis, F., Guida, D., & Cestari, A. (2011). Nature and aims of geomorphological mapping. Developments in Earth Surface Processes, 15, 13–23.
  12. Geological Survey of India (GSI). (2011). http://www.portal.gsi.gov.in.
  13. Gita Press. (2022). Sri Shiva Mahapuran (Hindi). 1 and 2. Gita Press Gorakhpur.
  14. Gordon, J. E. (2018). Geoheritage, Geotourism and the Cultural Landscape: Enhancing the Visitor Experience and Promoting Geoconservation. Geosciences, 8(4), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040136.
  15. Harsha, J., Ravikumar, A. S., & Shivakumar, B. L. (2020). Evaluation of morphometric parameters and hypsometric curve of Arkavathy river basin using RS and GIS techniques. Applied Water Science, 10, 86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1164-9.
  16. Hayden, R. S. (1985). Global mega-geomorphology. Proceedings in National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and International Union of Geological Sciences, Arizona. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19850024044/downloads/19850024044.pdf.
  17. Hills, E. S. (1975). Physiography of Victoria (First edition). Whitcombe & Tombs, Melbourne.
  18. Huggett, R. J. (2011). Fundamentals of Geomorphology, Third Edition. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://sudartomas.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/fundamentalsofgeomorphology_routledgefundamentalsofphysicalgeography.pdf.
  19. Iwahashi, J., & Pike, R. J. (2007). Automated classifications of topography from DEMs by an unsupervised nested-means algorithm and a three-part geometric signature. Geomorphology, 86(3-4), 409–440.
  20. Kim, J., Lin, S. Y., & Xiao, H. (2023). Remote Sensing and Data Analyses on Planetary Topography. Remote Sensing, 15, 2954. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15122954.
  21. King, C. A. M. (1966). Techniques in Geomorphology. Arnold, London.
  22. Kramrisch, S. (1981). Manifestations of Shiva. Philadelphia Museum of Art. Philadelphia, PA. https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/book_archive/196174216674_10153173367576675.pdf.
  23. Langbein, W. B., et al. (1947). Topographic Characteristics of Drainage Basins. U. S. Geological Survey, W.S. Paper 968-C, 125–157.
  24. Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., & Miller, J. P. (1964). Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. 522.
  25. (2019). Why are Jyotirlinga temples in India positioned as per fibonacci/pingala series? Resonant News. https://resonantnews.com/2019/09/09/why-are-jyotirlinga-temples-positioned-as-per-fibonacci-series/.
  26. Macdonald, Heather, Wynn, Russell, Huvenne, Veerle, Peakall, Jeff, Masson, Douglas, Weaver, Philip, & Mcphail, S. D. (2011). New insights into the morphology, fill, and remarkable longevity (>0.2 m.y.) Of modern deep-water erosional scours along the northeast Atlantic margin. Geosphere, 7, 845–867.
  27. MacMillan, R. A., & Shary, P. A. (2009). Landforms and Landform Elements in Geomorphometry. Developments in Soil Science, Elsevier, 33.
  28. Martins, Bruno. (2016). Interactions between geomorphological heritage and cultural landscape of Serra do Alvão: the perspective of cultural geomorphology. Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia.
  29. Mc Keever, P. J., & Narbonne, G. M. (2021). Geological World Heritage: a revised global framework for the application of criterion (viii) of the World Heritage Convention. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  30. Mitra Channa S., & Lobo, L. (2023). Religious pluralism in India: ethnographic and philosophic evidence, 1886–1936. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
  31. Mittal, M. (2016). Shiv Puran. Sixth Edition. Manoj Publication, New Delhi.
  32. Mukherjee, S., Bhattacharjee, S., & Singha, S. S. (2020). Religious to Spiritual Tourism – An Era of Paradigm Shift in India. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, XII(II), 427-441. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3546903.
  33. Nilson, T., & Thorell, K. (2018). Cultural heritage preservation: the past, the present and the future. Halmstad University Press, Halmstad. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1224014/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  34. Ohmori, H. (1993). Changes in the Hypsometric Curve through Mountain Building Resulting from Concurrent Tectonics and Denudation. Geomorphology, 8(4), 263–277.
  35. Oyatayo, K. T., Bello, I., Ndabula, C., Godwill, G. J., & Ademola, S. J. (2017). A comparative analysis of drainage morphometry on hydrologic characteristics of Kereke and Ukoghor basins on flood vulnerability in Makurdi town, Nigeria. Hydrology, 5(3), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20170503.11.
  36. Pareta, K. (2003). Morphometric analysis of Dhasan river basin, India. Uttar Bharat Bhoogol Patrika, Gorakhpur, 39, 15–35.
  37. Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2012). Quantitative geomorphological analysis of a watershed of Ravi River basin, H.P. India. International Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 1(1), 47–62.
  38. Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2013). Geological investigation of Rahatgarh waterfall of Sagar (M. P.) through the field survey and satellite remote sensing techniques. International Journal of Geology, 5(3), 72–79.
  39. Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2021). Form and process-based geomorphic classification and mapping of a meandering river using satellite remote sensing data. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(2064), 2–16.
  40. Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2023). Recent Development in Geomorphology including Case Studies of Indian Territories. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Republic of Moldova, Chisinau.
  41. Pareta, K., Reddy, T., & Singh, H. (2022). Geomorphological Analysis of Ayad River Basin, Udaipur (India) using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(5), 423–442.
  42. Paron, P., & Claessens, L. (2011). Makers and users of geomorphological maps. In M. J. Smith, P. Paron, & J. Griffiths (Eds.), Geomorphological Mapping: Methods and Applications (pp. 75–106). Elsevier.
  43. Pijet-Migoń, E., & Migoń, P. (2022). Geoheritage and Cultural Heritage – A Review of Recurrent and Interlinked Themes. Geosciences, 12(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020098.
  44. Prajapati, A. (2023). Unveiling the Mystical Aura of Nageshwar Jyotirlinga temple. https://www.akashprajapati.com/nageshwar-jyotirlinga-temple/.
  45. Ray, R. G. (1960). Aerial photographs in geologic interpretation and mapping. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper-373, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0373/report.pdf.
  46. Reynard, E., & Giusti, C. (2018). The Landscape and the Cultural Value of Geoheritage. In Geoheritage, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00008-3.
  47. Ritter, D. F., Kochel, R. C., & Miller, J. R. (1995). Process geomorphology. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York. https://www.wou.edu/las/physci/taylor/geog522/rittchp5.pdf.
  48. (2020). Living with and responding to risk in the Uttarakhand Himalayas: A call for prioritizing lived experiences in research policy praxis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101499.
  49. Riva, R., Varine, H. D., Garlandini, A., & Mussinelli, E. (2017). Ecomuseums and cultural landscapes, state of the art and future prospects. Maggioli Editore, Romagna. http://www.sitda.net/downloads/biblioteca/Riva_Ecomuseums_ebook.pdf.
  50. Rosengren, N. (1984). Sites of geological and geomorphological significance in the Shire of Otway. Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands.
  51. Rudra Centre. (2023). Shiva Lingam – meaning and significance. https://www.rudraksha-ratna.com/articles/shiva-lingam.
  52. Sarp, G., Toprak, V., & Duzgun, S. (2011). Hypsometric properties of the hydraulic basins located on the Western part of Nafz. In 34th International symposium on remote sensing of the environment theme: water a limited and degraded resource, Sydney, Australia.
  53. Satpathy, B. B. (2010). Indian culture and heritage. Utkal University. https://ddceutkal.ac.in/Syllabus/MA_history/paper-8-N.pdf.
  54. Schmidt, J., & Hewitt, A. (2004). Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position. Geoderma, 121(3-4), 243–256.
  55. Singh, R. P. B. (2011). Holy Places and Pilgrimages in India: Emerging Trends & Bibliography. In R. P. B. Singh (Ed.), Holy Places and Pilgrimages: Essays on India (pp. 07–56). Shubhi Publications.
  56. Sinha Roy, S. (2002). Hypsometry and landform evolution: a case study in the Banas drainage basin, Rajasthan, with implications for Aravalli uplift. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 60, 7–26.
  57. Strahler, A. N. (1952). Hypsometric (Area-Altitude) Analysis of Erosional Topography. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 63, 1117–1142.
  58. Thinnakorn, W., & Anurak, T. (2022). Valuing cultural landscape heritage in historic areas: Proposed assessment criteria from Thailand. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(5), 1543–1551. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170518.
  59. Thomas, S., & Cathy, L. (2006). Conserving cultural and biological diversity: the role of sacred natural sites and cultural landscapes. In International Symposium on Conserving Cultural and Biological Diversity: The Role of Sacred Natural Sites and Cultural Landscapes, Aichi, Japan. UNESDOC Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000147863.
  60. Thornbury, W. D. (1954). Principles of geomorphology. John Wiley and Sons, INC.
  61. Vivoni, E. R., Benedetto, F. D., Grimaldi, S., & Eltahir, E. A. B. (2008). Hypsometric control on surface and subsurface run-off. Water Resources Research, 44, W12502. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006931.
  62. Woodwell, G. M. (1990). The Earth in Transition: Patterns and Processes of Biotic Impoverishment. Cambridge University Press.
  63. Yangchan, J., Tiwari, A. K., & Sood, A. (2015). Morphometric analysis of drainage basin through GIS: a case study of Sukhna lake watershed in lower Shiwalik, India. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6(2), 1015–1023.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]

    2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn

nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2230-7990[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume 15
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 01
Received February 20, 2024
Accepted April 23, 2024
Published May 10, 2024

n

n

Views: 16

n

n

n

n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]