Effect of 3D Printing Process Parameters on the Tensile Strength of Polylactic Acid (PLA)

[{“box”:0,”content”:”n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n[if 2704 equals=”Yes”]n

n

Notice

nThis is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.n

n[/if 2704]n

n

Year : 2025 [if 2224 equals=””]29/08/2025 at 3:14 PM[/if 2224] | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : 13 [else] Volume : 13[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue : [/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 05 | Page : 128 140

n

n

nn

n

n

n

    By

    n

    [foreach 286]n

    n

    Aniket Kolekar, Amol Mali, Ganesh Jadhav, Sunil Dambhare, Sandesh Solepatil, Vikas Dive, Rita Kakade,

    n t

  • n

    n[/foreach]

    n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Professor, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, D Y Patil International University, Akurdi, Pune, Department of Mechanical Engineering, D Y Patil International University, Akurdi, Pune, Department of Mechanical Engineering, D Y Patil International University, Akurdi, Pune, Department of Mechanical Engineering, D Y Patil International University, Akurdi, Pune, Department of Mechanical Engineering, D Y Patil International University, Akurdi, Pune, Department of Mechanical Engineering, D Y Patil International University, Akurdi, Pune, ASM Institute of Business Management and Research, Chinchwad, Pune, Maharashtra, Maharshtra, Maharshtra, Maharshtra, Maharshtra, Maharshtra, Maharshtra, India, India, India, India, India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

n

n

nThis study employs the Taguchi approach to systematically analyze and optimize critical Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) parameters, focusing on their effect on the tensile strength of 3D-printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) components. The study explores three levels of layer thickness (0.15 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.3 mm), infill densities (25%, 50%, and 75%), and nozzle temperatures (200°C, 205°C, and 210°C) across three infill patterns: Triangular, Gyroid, and Zig-zag. A total of nine experimental runs were conducted using the L9 orthogonal array design of experiments (DOE), and the mechanical performance was evaluated through tensile testing in accordance with ISO 527 standards. The findings revealed that infill density had the greatest impact on tensile strength, with layer thickness and nozzle temperature being the next most significant parameters. Among the tested patterns, the triangular infill yielded the highest tensile strength of 45.03 MPa at 75% infill density, 0.15 mm layer thickness, and 210°C nozzle temperature. The tensile performance was validated using COMSOL Multiphysics finite element simulations, showing close agreement with experimental results. Statistical analysis using MINITAB-18 and ANOVA confirmed the significance of the parameters. This comprehensive study not only identifies optimal parameter combinations for PLA-based 3D printing but also provides valuable insights for improving the structural performance of FDM components in engineering applications.nn

n

n

n

Keywords: 3D Printing, polylactic acid (PLA), MINITAB-18 ANOVA, taguchi method, tensile strength.

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites ]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites (jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

aWQ6MjI1MDgwfGZpbGVuYW1lOjM4MDAzMWI0LWZpLmF2aWZ8c2l6ZTp0aHVtYm5haWw=

n

n

How to cite this article:
nAniket Kolekar, Amol Mali, Ganesh Jadhav, Sunil Dambhare, Sandesh Solepatil, Vikas Dive, Rita Kakade. [if 2584 equals=”][226 wpautop=0 striphtml=1][else]Effect of 3D Printing Process Parameters on the Tensile Strength of Polylactic Acid (PLA)[/if 2584]. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 29/07/2025; 13(05):128-140.

n

How to cite this URL:
nAniket Kolekar, Amol Mali, Ganesh Jadhav, Sunil Dambhare, Sandesh Solepatil, Vikas Dive, Rita Kakade. [if 2584 equals=”][226 striphtml=1][else]Effect of 3D Printing Process Parameters on the Tensile Strength of Polylactic Acid (PLA)[/if 2584]. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 29/07/2025; 13(05):128-140. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=29/07/2025/view=0

nn

n

n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]Full Text PDF[/if 992]n

n

n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]n

n

n[/if 992]n

nn

nnn

n[if 379 not_equal=””]nn

Browse Figures

n

n

n[foreach 379]

figures

[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]

n

n

n

n

n

References n

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Ali S, Chaurasia DK, Shukla TP. A review: 3D printing. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2022;10(12):1939–41.
  2. Jandyal A, Chaturvedi I, Wazir I, Raina A, Haq MIU. 3D printing – A review of processes, materials and applications in Industry 4.0. Sustain Oper Comput. 2022;3:33–42.
  3. Siraj I, Bharti PS. 3D printing process: A review of recent research. Sci Prog Res. 2021;1(3):166–76.
  4. Chennakesava Sai P, Yeole SN. Fused deposition modeling – insights. In: Proc Int Conf Adv Design Manuf (ICAD&M’14); 2014 Dec 5–7; Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu. p. 1345–50.
  5. Kaptan A, Kartal F. The effect of fill rate on mechanical properties of PLA printed samples. Igdir Univ J Inst Sci Technol. 2020;10(3):1919–27.
  6. Gonzalez YE, Mendoza JM, Durán JR, Vertel LCT, Rhenals-Julio JD. Effect of printing parameters on mechanical properties and processing time of additively manufactured parts. Matéria (Rio J). 2023;28(3):526–42.
  7. Tontowi AE, Ramdani L. Optimization of 3D-printer process parameters for improving quality of polylactic acid printed part. Int J Eng Technol. 2017;9(2):589–600.
  8. Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des. 2014;58:242–6.
  9. Rismalia M, Hidajat SC, Permana IGR, Hadisujoto B, Muslimin M, Triawan F. Infill pattern and density effects on the tensile properties of 3D printed PLA material. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1402(4):044045.
  10. Batan IML, Chandradewi AL, Wahjudi A, Harnany D. Optimization of 3D printing parameter process for product tensile strength from PLA materials using the Taguchi method. JMES Int J Mech Eng Sci. 2023;7(2):90.
  11. Gonzalez YE, Mendoza JM, Durán JR, Vertel LCT, Rhenals-Julio JD. Effect of printing parameters on mechanical properties and processing time of additively manufactured parts. Matéria (Rio J). 2023;28(3):1022–34.
  12. Bakar AABA, Zainal ABA. Mechanical properties of poly(lactic) acid PLA-based 3D printed filament under temperature and environmental conditions. Mater Today Proc. 2022;67:652–8.
  13. Ntumi S. Reporting and interpreting one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using a data-driven example: A practical guide for social science researchers. J Res Educ Sci. 2021;12(14):38.
  14. Atakok G, Kam M, Koc HB. Tensile, three-point bending and impact strength of 3D printed parts using PLA and recycled PLA filaments: A statistical investigation. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;18:1542–54.
  15. Zisopol DG, Minescu M, Iacob DV. Experimental study on mechanical properties of materials used in the oil industry. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res. 2024;14(2):13487–92.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

n


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Polymer and Composites

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2321–2810[/if 344]

n

n

n

nn

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n[if 1746 equals=”Retracted”]n

n

n

n

[/if 1746]n[if 4734 not_equal=””]

n

n

n

[/if 4734]n

n

Volume 13
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 05
Received 11/06/2025
Accepted 01/07/2025
Published 29/07/2025
Retracted
Publication Time 48 Days

n

n

nn


n

Login

n
My IP
n

PlumX Metrics

nn

n

n

n[if 1746 equals=”Retracted”]n

[/if 1746]nnn

nnn”}]