EFFECT OF CALCINATION CONDITION AND COOLING METHOD ON REACTIVITY OF LIME SLUDGE

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]

n

Open Access

n

[/if 992]n

n

Year : | Volume : 11 | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

    n t

    [foreach 286]n

    n

    Arti Chouksey, Nirendra Dev, VVL Kanta Rao

  1. [/foreach]

    n

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Assistant Professor, Professor, Ex. Principal Scientist, Department of Civil Engineering, DCRUST MURTHAL, Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi Technological Institute, Bridge and Structure Division, CRRI, Haryana, Delhi, Delhi, India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn

n

Abstract

nIn this Experimental Study, Raw Lime sludge from the Paper industry was characterized by XRD and TGA techniques. Lime Sludge was calcined for a temperature range of 550–7500C for 2 h and cooled by air cooling. The effect of calcination temperature on the reactivity of resultant Sludge was investigated by various indirect and direct methods of pozzolanic activity assessment such as the Strength Activity Test(SAI), Lime reactivity test, XRD, TGA, and API. It was concluded that the calcination of lime sludge affects the microstructure and pozzolanic reactivity of the resultant Sludge. For Calcination temperatures lower than 7000C, Calcinations of CaCO3 are not complete. Whereas at higher temperatures, the crystallization of amorphous content was enhanced. It is observed that calcinations of Sludge at a temperature of 7500C for 2h and slow cooling condition increases the pozzolanic reactivity of Sludge. Results showed that compared to other pozzolanic admixtures such as FA or BFS, CPS (Calcined Paper Sludge) had superior pozzolanic activity. With a calcination temperature of 750 °C, a calcination time of 2 hours, and a slow cooling method, their pozzolanic activity was exceptionally good. At 28 days old, the SAI (percent) of mortar with CPS produced under ideal circumstances was 94%, comparable with the fly ash’s quality (Class F).

n

n

n

Keywords: Lime Sludge, Calcination, Calcined Clay, SAI, XRD, TGA, Lime Reactivity Test

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Arti Chouksey, Nirendra Dev, VVL Kanta Rao EFFECT OF CALCINATION CONDITION AND COOLING METHOD ON REACTIVITY OF LIME SLUDGE jopc ; :-

n

How to cite this URL: Arti Chouksey, Nirendra Dev, VVL Kanta Rao EFFECT OF CALCINATION CONDITION AND COOLING METHOD ON REACTIVITY OF LIME SLUDGE jopc {cited };:-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=/view=0

nn


nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[else] nvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue == ‘indexingbodies’) {n document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘);n }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘administrator’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘jopc’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }n else { document.write(‘ ‘); }n [/if 992] [if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

nn

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Schneider, M. & Romer, Michael & Tschudin, M. & Bolio, Hugo. (2011). Sustainable Cement Production – Present and Future. Cement and Concrete Research. 41. 642-650. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019.
  2. Samad, A. Shah, 2017. Role of binary cement including Supplementary Cementitious Material (SCM), in production of environmentally sustainable concrete: A critical review. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. Volume 6, Issue 2, 663674.
  3. Scrivener, K., 2014. Options for the future of cement. Indian Concr. J. 88, 7
  4. Habert, Guillaume & Arribe, David & Dehove, Thibault & Espinasse, Ludovic & Le Roy, Robert. (2012). Reducing environmental impact by increasing the strength of concrete: Quantification of the improvement to concrete bridges. Journal of Cleaner Production. 35. 250–262. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.028.
  5. Euler Hermes publications. 2018. PAPER: GLOBAL SECTOR REPORT 2018. [ONLINE] Available         at          :http://www.euler,hermes.com/economic research/publications/Pages/paper-global-sector-report-2018.aspx?postID=1357. [Accessed 20th January 2020].
  6. Azevedo, Afonso & Alexandre, Jonas & Xavier, Gustavo & Pedroti, Leonardo., 2018. Recycling paper industry effluent sludge for use in mortars: A sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 192..
  7. Hicks, J., 2010. Durable ‘green’ concrete from activated pozzolan cement. Green Streets and Highways 2010: An Interactive Conf. on the State of the Art and How to Achieve Sustainable Outcomes. Neil Weinstein, ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, 408–430.
  8. Segui, P.; Aubert, J.E.; Husson, B.; Measson, M., 2012. Characterization of Wastepaper Sludge Ash for its Valorization as a Component of Hydraulic Binders. Applied Clay Science. Vol.57 , 79–85
  9. Science Direct. 2018. Pulp and paper industry. [ONLINE] Available at: https://sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/pulp-and-paperindustry. [Accessed 28 Janurary 2020].
  10. Bajpai, P. 2015. Generation of Waste in Pulp and Paper Mill. Springer International Publishing Switzerlan
  11. Sahu, Vaishali & V, Gayathri., 2014. The Use of Fly Ash and Lime Sludge as Partial Replacement of Cement in Mortar. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation. 4. 30-37
  12. Olivier, J.G.., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M., Peters, J.A.H.W., 2016. Trends in global CO2 emissions: 2016 report. PLB Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands
  13. Benhelal, E., Zahedi, G., Shamsaei, E., Bahadori, A., 2013. Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 51, 142-161.
  14. , 2007.Assessment of utilization of industrial solid wastes in cement manufacturing. Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi
  15. Ernst Worrell, Lynn Price, Nathan Martin, Chris Hendriks, and Leticia Ozawa Meida, 2016. Carbon Dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 26:1, 303-329.
  16. Hasanbeigi, Ali & Price, Lynn & Lin, Elina., 2012. Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission- reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16, 6220–6238
  17. Snellings, R., Salze, A., and Scrivener, K. L., 2014. Use of X-ray diffraction to quantify amorphous supplementary cementitious materials in anhydrous and hydrated blended cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 64,89–98.
  18. Damtoft, J.S., Lukasik, J., Herfort, D., Sorrentino, D., Gartner, E.M., 2008. Sustainable development and climate change initiatives. Cem. Concr. Res. 38, 115-127
  19. Dehui Wang, Caijun Shi, Nima Farzadnia, Zhenguo Shi, Huangfei Jia, Zhihua Ou.,(2018). A review on use of limestone powder in cement-based materials: Mechanism, hydration and microstructures, Construction and Building Materials. Volume 181,659-672
  20. Hong-seok Jang, Yong-Taek Lim, Je-Hong Kang, Seung-young So, Hyoung-seok So, Influence of calcination and cooling conditions on pozzolanic reactivity of paper mill sludge, Construction and Building Materials Volume 166, 2018, Pages257-270, ISSN 0950-0618 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.119
  21. Bakolas, A., Aggelakopoulou, E. Pozzolanic activity of natural pozzolan–lime pastes and physicomechanical characteristics. J Therm Anal Calorim 135, 2953–2961 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7612-1
  22. IS 8112 (1989): Specification for 43 grade ordinary Portland cement
  23. Antoni, Mathieu & Rossen, John & Martirena Hernandez, Jose Fernando & Scrivener, Karen., 2012. Cement Substitution by a Combination of Metakaolin and Limestone. Cement and Concrete Research. 42, 1579–1589
  24. , 2012. Compressive Strength and Chloride Resistance of Metakaolin Concrete. Journal of Civil Engineering. vol. 16 (7), pp1209 – 1217
  25. Evi Aprianti S., 2017. A huge number of artificial waste material can be supplementary cementitious Material (SCM) for concrete production – a review part II. Journal of Cleaner Production. 142, 4, 4178- 4194
  26. IS 1727 (1967): Methods of test for pozzolanic materials
  27. Cri-eng-sp 965., 2000. Utilization of lime sludge for value added products and .productivity enhancement of lime kilns , National Council for Cement and Building Materials New Delhi
  28. Prabhat Vashistha, Vivek Kumar, S.K. Singh, Dharm Dutt, Gaurav Tomar, Pooja Yadav, Valorization of paper mill lime sludge via application in building construction materials: A review, Construction and Building Materials, Volume 211, 2019, Pages 371-382, ISSN 0950-0618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.085

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

Open Access Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Polymer and Composites

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2321–2810[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received September 16, 2023
Accepted October 31, 2023
Published

n

n

n

n

n

nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]