Kum Gwon Choe,
Yu Mi Sin,
Sol Song Pak,
Ji Yong Ri,
Jong Gil Pak,
- Faculty, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, North Korea, Korea
- Faculty, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, North Korea, Korea
- Faculty, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, North Korea, Korea
- Faculty, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, North Korea, Korea
- Faculty, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, North Korea, Korea
Abstract
The geometric complication caused by the “rings” and “sails” used to make the parachutist’s canopy provides a considerable computationally problem, which is the focus of this paper’s fluid–structure interaction (FSI) modeling of ringsail parachutes. Based on the sustained space-time FSI (SSTFSI) method, we have developed an FSI simulation of ringsail jumping devices. The FSI Geometric Smoothing Technique and the Homogenized Modeling of Geometric Porosity represent a pair of the above interface projection methods. We outline our use of one of these supplemental methods to ringsail parachutes in FSI simulations. We consider a single primary parachute in the simulations we give here, which carries one-third of the overall vehicle’s entire burden. Researchers show the findings from FSI simulation of unloading, that involve drifting under cross wind influence and, as a specific instance, losing warmth shielding.
Keywords: Ringsail parachute, Orion space vehicle, fluid–structure interaction, offloading, drifting
[This article belongs to Journal of Experimental & Applied Mechanics (joeam)]
Kum Gwon Choe, Yu Mi Sin, Sol Song Pak, Ji Yong Ri, Jong Gil Pak. Understanding Side-wind Dynamics and Deciphering Ringsail Parachute Drift. Journal of Experimental & Applied Mechanics. 2024; 15(01):1-12.
Kum Gwon Choe, Yu Mi Sin, Sol Song Pak, Ji Yong Ri, Jong Gil Pak. Understanding Side-wind Dynamics and Deciphering Ringsail Parachute Drift. Journal of Experimental & Applied Mechanics. 2024; 15(01):1-12. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joeam/article=2024/view=150705
References
- Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26:27–36Comput Mech (2008) 43:133–142,141
- Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S (1994) Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 119:157–177
- Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1994) Massively parallel finite element computation of incompressible flows involving fluid–body interactions. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 112:253–282
- Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows—Fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 21:933–953
- Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1999) Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations. Computat Mech 23:130–143
- Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 190:321–332
- Stein K, Benney R, Kalro V, Tezduyar TE, Leonard J, Accorsi M(2000) Parachute fluid–structure interactions: 3-D computation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 190:373–386
- Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 191:717–726
- Ohayon R (2001) Reduced symmetric models for modal analysis of internal structural-acoustic and hydroelastic-sloshing systems. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 190:3009–3019
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2004) Space–time techniques for finite element computation of flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Gallegos S, Herrera I, Botello S, Zarate F, Ayala G (eds) Proceedings of the III international congress on numerical methods in engineering and applied science, CD-ROM, Monterrey, Mexico
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2004) Influence of wall elasticity on image-based blood flow simulation. Jpn Soc Mech Eng J Ser A 70:1224–1231 (in Japanese)
- van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2005) On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluid–structure interaction problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 27:599–621
- Michler C, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2005) An interface Newton–Krylov solver for fluid–structure interaction. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 47:1189–1195
- Gerbeau J-F, Vidrascu M, Frey P (2005) Fluid–structure interaction in blood flow on geometries based on medical images. Comp Struc 83:155–165
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions.Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:2002–2027
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006) Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time formulations. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:5743–5753
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid–structure interactions with the Deforming-Spatial-Domain/Stabilized Space–Time formulation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:1885–1895
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K, Aureli L (2006) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time techniques. In: Bungartz H-J, Schafer M (eds) Fluid–structure interaction, vol 53. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 50–81
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Comput Mech 38:482–490
- Dettmer W, Peric D (2006) A computational framework for fluid–structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:5754–5779
- Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322
- Khurram RA, Masud A (2006) A multiscale/stabilized formulation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations for moving boundary flows and fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 38: 403–416
- Kuttler U, Forster C, Wall WA (2006) A solution for the incompressibility dilemma in partitioned fluid–structure interaction with pure Dirichlet fluid domains. Comput Mech 38:417–429
- Lohner R, Cebral JR, Yang C, Baum JD, Mestreau EL, Soto O(2006) Extending the range of applicability of the loose coupling approach for FSI simulations. In: Bungartz H-J, Schafer M (eds)Fluid–structure interaction, vol 53. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 82–100
- Bletzinger K-U, Wuchner R, Kupzok A (2006) Algorithmic treatment of shells and free form-membranes in FSI. In: Bungartz H-J, Schafer M (eds) Fluid–structure interaction, vol 53. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, Springer, Heidelberg,pp 336–355
- Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE(2007) Influence of wall elasticity in patient-specific hemodynamic Comp Fluids 36:160–168
- Masud A, Bhanabhagvanwala M, Khurram RA (2007) An adaptive mesh rezoning scheme for moving boundary flows and fluid–structure interaction. Comp Fluids 36:77–91
- Sawada T, Hisada T (2007) Fuid–structure interaction analysis of the two dimensional flag-in-wind problem by an interface tracking ALE finite element method. Comp Fluids 36:136–146
- Wall WA, Genkinger S, Ramm E (2007) A strong coupling partitioned approach for fluid–structure interaction with free surfaces. Comp Fluids 36:169–183
- Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) A fully-integrated approach to fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech (in preparation)
- Stein KR, Benney RJ, Kalro V, Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1997) Parallel computation of parachute fluid–structure interactions. In: Proceedings of AIAA 14th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, AIAA paper 97-1505, San Francisco
- Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44
- Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space–time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 94:339–351
- Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space–time procedure: Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 94:353–371
- Tezduyar TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 43:555–575
- Hughes TJR, Brooks AN (1979) A multi-dimensional upwind scheme with no crosswind diffusion. In: Hughes TJR (ed) Finite element methods for convection dominated flows, AMD-vol 34.ASME, New York, pp 19–35
- Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259
- Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comp Meth Appl MechEng 95:221–242 123 142 Comput Mech (2008) 43:133–142
- Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Balestra M (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuška–Brezzi condition: a stable Petrov–Galerkin formulation of the Stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 59:85–99
- Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA (1992) Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods space–time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel In: New methods in transient analysis, PVP-vol246/AMD-vol 143, ASME, New York, pp l7–24
- Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94
- Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1997) Parallel computation of incompressible flows with complex geometries. Int J Numer Meth Fluids24:1321–1340
- Tezduyar T (2001) Finite element interface-tracking and interface capturing techniques for flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Proceedings of the ASME symposium on fluid-physics and heat transfer for macro- and micro-scale gas–liquid and phase-change flows (CD-ROM), ASME paper IMECE2001/HTD-24206,ASME, New York
- Tezduyar TE (2003) Stabilized finite element formulations and interface-tracking and interface-capturing techniques for incompressible flows. In: Hafez MM (ed) Numerical simulations of incompressible flows. World Scientific, New Jersey, pp 221–239
- Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid–structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70:58–63
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Senga M, Aureli L, Stein K, Griffin B (2005) Finite element modeling of fluid–structure interactions with space–time and advanced mesh update techniques. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on numerical methods in continuum mechanics (CD-ROM), Zilina, Slovakia
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 54:855–900
- Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1992) A finite element study of incompressible flows past oscillating cylinders and aerofoils. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 15:1073–1118
- Stein K, Benney R, Tezduyar T, Kalro V, Leonard J, Accorsi M (1999) 3-D computation of parachute fluid–structure interactions: performance and control. In: Proceedings of CEAS/AIAA 15th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, AIAA paper 99-1714, Toulouse, France
- Stein K, Benney R, Tezduyar T, Kalro V, Potvin J, Bretl T (1999) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of a cross parachute: comparison of numerical predictions with wind tunnel data. In: Proceedings of CEAS/AIAA 15th aerodynamic decelerator systems technology conference, AIAA Paper 99-1725, Toulouse, France
- Stein K, Benney R, Tezduyar T, Potvin J (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a cross parachute: numerical simulation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 191:673–687
- Stein KR, Benney RJ, Tezduyar TE, Leonard JW, Accorsi ML (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a round parachute: modeling and simulation techniques. J Aircraft 38:800–808
- Tezduyar TE (2003) Stabilized finite element methods for flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. HERMIS Int J Comp Math Appl 4:63–88
- Tezduyar TE (2004) Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Stein E, De Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, vol 3. Fluids, Chap 17. Wiley, New York
- Tezduyar TE (2004) Moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Franca LP, Tezduyar TE, Masud A (eds) Finite element methods: 1970’s and beyond, CIMNE, Barcelona, pp 205–220
- Tezduyar TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: special methods and enhanced solution techniques. Comp Fluids 36:207–223
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Cragin T, Nanna B, Conklin BS, Pausewang J, Schwaab M (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: arterial fluid Int J Numer Meth Fluids 54:901–922
- Tezduyar TE, Pausewang J, Sathe S (2007) FSI modeling of sails. In: Onate E, Garcia J, Bergan P, Kvamsdal T (eds) Marine 2007, CIMNE, Barcelona
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin BS (2007) Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space–time fluid–structure interaction technique. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. DOI:10. 1002/fld.1633
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Crabtree J, Christopher J (2007) Air–fabric interaction modeling with the stabilized space–time FSI technique. In: Proceedings of the third Asian-Pacific congress on computational mechanics (CD-ROM), Kyoto
- Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0261-7
- Saad Y, Schultz M (1986) GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7:856–869
- Karypis G, Kumar V (1998) A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J Sci Comput 20:359–392
Journal of Experimental & Applied Mechanics
Volume | 15 |
Issue | 01 |
Received | 23/04/2024 |
Accepted | 25/05/2024 |
Published | 14/06/2024 |