Towards Finding the Impact of Kinetic Information on Short Term Memory based Task

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[user_role]

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

n

    n t

  1. n

      [foreach 286]n

      1. n

    n

    n

    CHANDAN SHEIKDER

    n

    n

      n t

    1. n

    [/foreach]n

    n

    n

      [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

    1. Research Scholar,Department of Mechatronic Engineering, Hebei University of Technology,,Tianjin,China

      2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    Abstract

    nThe main objective of this report is to discover whether haptic data have an effect on the retention of a directive to choose a place
    scattered on a 2D plane. The necessity for a feasible workshop for the cell manufacturing line in plant assembly led to the idea. We created an
    organized viscuo-haptic training model that covered a grown-up arm’s workstation and used three different Ways to change the extent of
    preparation of perception data that delivered to the trainees. Graphical presentation with endorsement and graphical presentation with haptic
    guiding were the techniques used. We made a rough assessment of the three techniques’ preparation abilities. In terms of the number of
    repeated trails, it’s important to keep the request for two-dimensional sequenced options with subjective evaluation. The approach for graphical
    showcase with order provides the best demonstration, however the technique for visual display delivers quality demonstration.

    n

    n

    n

    Keywords: Computer Graphics, 3D Graphics and Realism, Virtual Reality, Demonstration and Material Gateway, Sensorial input and O/I, Client Experience, Information Interface.

    n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Control & Instrumentation(joci)]

    n

    [/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Control & Instrumentation(joci)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

    n

    n

    nn

    nn

    Full Text

    nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]https://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2023/06/087b99b9-1-8-towards-finding-the-impact-of-kinetic-information-on-short-term-memory-based-task.pdfn[else]nnvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue == ‘indexingbodies’) {ndocument.write(‘‘);ndocument.write(‘https://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2023/06/087b99b9-1-8-towards-finding-the-impact-of-kinetic-information-on-short-term-memory-based-task.pdf’);n} else if (fieldValue === ‘administrator’) {ndocument.write(‘‘);ndocument.write(”);n}else if (fieldValue === ‘joci’) {n document.write(‘‘);n} else {n document.write(‘ ‘);n}nn[/if 992]n

    n[if 379 not_equal=””]n

    Browse Figures

    n

    n

    [foreach 379]n

    n[/foreach]n

    nn

    n

    n[/if 379]n

    n

    References

    n[if 1104 equals=””]n

    [1]. J. Balakrishnan and C. Cheng. Multi-period planning and uncertainty issues in cellular manufacturing: A review and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1):281–309, 2007.
    [2]. Bettini, P. Marayong, S. Lang, A. Okamura, and G. Hager. Visionassisted control for manipulation using virtual fixtures. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 20(6):953–966, 2004.
    [3]. R. L. Cohen. On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(1):267–281, 1981.
    [4]. R. L. Cohen. Memory for action events: The power of enactment. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1):57–80, 1989.
    [5]. N. Cowan and Z. Chen. How chunks form in long-term memory and affect short-term memory limits. In Interactions Between Short-Term and Long- Term Memory in the Verbal Domain, pages 86–107. Psychology Press, 2008.
    [6]. J. Engelkamp and H. Zimmer. Motor similarity in subject-performed tasks. Psychological Research, 57(1):47–53, 1994.
    [7]. Feygin, M. Keehner, and F. Tendick. Haptic guidance: Experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. In
    Proceedings of the Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pages 40–47, 2002.
    [8]. R. B. Gillespie, M. S. OModhrain, P. Tang, D. Zaretzky, and C. Pham. The virtual teacher. In Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, volume 64, pages 171–178, 1998.
    [9]. T. Greene and R. Sadowski. A review of cellular manufacturing assumptions, advantages and design techniques. Journal of Operations Management, 4(2):85–97, 1984.
    [10]. T. Helstrup. One, two, or three memories? a problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychologica, 66(1):37– 68,
    1987.

    [11] T. Helstrup. In search of a motor element in memory for enacted events. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(3):389–403, 2005.[12]. R. Kormi-Nouri and L. Nilsson. The motor component is not crucial! In Memory for Action: A distinct form of episodic memory?, pages
    97–111. Oxford University Press, 2001.
    [13]. J. Lenarcic and A. Umek. Simple model of human arm reachable workspace. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,
    24(8):1239–1246, 1994.
    [14]. Y. Li, V. Patoglu, and M. O’Malley. Negative efficacy of fixed gain error reducing shared control for training in virtual environments.
    ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6(1):3, 2009.
    [15]. Miller. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review,
    63(2):81–97, 1956.
    [16]. U. Olofsson. The effect of enactment on memory for order. Psychological Research, 59(1):75–79, 1996.
    [17]. M. O’Malley and A. Gupta. Passive and active assistance for human performance of a simulated underactuated dynamic task. In
    Proceedings of the Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pages 348–355, 2003.
    [18]. O. Portillo, C. Avizzano, M. Raspolli, and M. Bergamasco. Haptic desktop for assisted handwriting and drawing. In Proceedings of the
    IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 512–517, 2005.
    [19]. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Personal communication. 2008.
    [20]. B. Sarker. Grouping efficiency measures in cellular manufacturing: a survey and critical review. International Journal of Production
    Research, 37(2):285–314, 1999.
    [21]. R. Schmidt and G. Wulf. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation. Human
    Factors, 39(4):509–525, 1997.
    [22]. Shambu, N. Suresh, and C. Pegels. Performance evaluation of cellular manufacturing systems: a taxonomy and review of research.
    International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16:81–103, 1996.
    [23]. J. Solis, C. Avizzano, and M. Bergamasco. Validating a skill transfer system based on reactive robots technology. In Proceedings of the
    IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 175–180, 2003.
    [24]. M. C. Steffens. The role of relational processing in memory for actions: A negative enactment effect in free recall. The Quarterly Journal
    of Experimental Psychology, 52(4):877–903, 1999.
    [25]. Z. Tan, M. A. Srinivasan, B. Eberman, and B. Cheng. Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of
    the Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pages 353–359, 1994.
    [26]. F. Unverzagt, K. Hall, A. Torke, J. Rediger, N. Mercado, O. Gureje, B. Osuntokun, and H. Hendrie. Effects of age, education, and gender
    on cerad neuropsychological test performance in an african american sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10(2):180–190, 1996.

    nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

      [foreach 1102]n t

    1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]

      2. n[/foreach]

    n[/if 1104]

    nn

    nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

    n[/if 1114]

    n

    n

    Regular Issue Subscription Original Research

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    Journal of Control & Instrumentation

    n

    [if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2229-6972[/if 344]

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    n

    Volume 14
    Issue 01
    Received April 14, 2023
    Accepted April 25, 2023
    Published May 30, 2023

    n

    n

    Views: 475
    n

    [if 1190 not_equal=””]n

    Editor

    n

    [foreach 1188]n

    n[/foreach]

    n[/if 1190] [if 1177 not_equal=””]n

    Reviewer

    n

    [foreach 1176]n

    Dr. Bibhu Prasad Ganthia

    n[/foreach]

    n[/if 1177]

    n

    nn .post-views{n text-align: center;n }n .ALLreveiwers img,.ALLeditors img{n width: 50px;n height: 50px;n border-radius: 50px;n margin: 10px;n }n .ALLreveiwers,.ALLeditors{n border-bottom:1px solid black;n }n .modaltext{color:white; padding: 0px 30px 0px 30px; text-decoration:none;}n .modaltext:hover{color:black background-color:rgb(255 221 204); color:black;}n .modal-content{ margin-top: 50%;}n Edit n function myfun() {n x=document.getElementById(“editor”);n y=document.getElementById(“down”);n z=document.getElementById(“up”);n if(x.style.display==”none”){n x.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n x.style.display=”none”;n }n if(y.style.display==”none”){n y.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n y.style.display=”none”;n }n if(z.style.display==”none”){n z.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n z.style.display=”none”;n }n }n function myfun2() {n x=document.getElementById(“reviewer”);n y=document.getElementById(“down2”);n z=document.getElementById(“up2″);n if(x.style.display==”none”){n x.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n x.style.display=”none”;n }n if(y.style.display==”none”){n y.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n y.style.display=”none”;n }n if(z.style.display==”none”){n z.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n z.style.display=”none”;n }n }n n table, tr, td{n padding: 10px;n border: none;n }n

    n

    n

    n h2{font-size:16px !important; font-family: ‘Roboto’, Slab !important; line-height: 1.4em;}n h3{font-size:18px !important;font-family: ‘Roboto’, Slab !important;}n h4{font-family: ‘Roboto’, Slab !important;}n a{color:blue; font-size:15px !important;font-family: ‘Roboto’, Slab !important;}n li, p{font-size: 15px !important; font-family: ‘Roboto’, Slab !important; text-align: justify;}n .authdiv img{max-width:17px; max-height:17px;}n .authdiv{display:flex; padding: 1px 2px;”}n n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;}n else {x.style.display = “Block”;}}n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);});n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);});n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));}n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));}n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) {slideIndex = 1;}n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n

    “}]