A Review on Nano Filtration System

Year : 2024 | Volume :10 | Issue : 02 | Page : 1-4
By

Ali Haider1,

Aisha Rafique,

Amna Akram,

Sadaf Iqbal,

Safeer Abbas,

Sarmad Yousaf,

Sami Ullah,

Marva Asghar,

Ayesha Saddiqa,

Mehnaz Liaqat,

Muhammad Kaleem Ullah,

  1. Student Department of Chemistry Superior University Lahore Pakistan
  2. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  3. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  4. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  5. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  6. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  7. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  8. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  9. Student Department of Chemistry Government College University, Faisalabad Pakistan
  10. Student Department of Chemistry COMSATS University of Islamabad Islamabad, Pakistan
  11. Student Department of Zoology University of Okara Okara Pakistan

Abstract

In the later half of the 1980s, nanofiltration (NF) became a significant development in the purification of water. When NF was first introduced, it was marketed as a less energy-intensive substitute for traditional techniques like reverse osmosis (RO). However, as its special qualities and uses became clear, NF was acknowledged as a separate technology in 1988. Comprehending the differences between ultrafiltration (UF), RO, and NF is essential to appreciating its scope and potential. While NF is related to both RO and UF, it is also distinguished by its unique properties. Important authors like Cadotte and Eriksson defined the nomenclature and theory of nonfiction field theory (NF) in their seminal works; Eriksson frequently credited as the original because of his thorough characterization of the parameters of the NF process. The development of FilmTec’s membrane stability, flux, and selectivity was essential in making NF stand out as a unique unit operation in the water treatment industry. Nanometer-sized pores, while the term “pores” in this context may be a bit misleading, are what distinguish NF membranes. However, because NF rejects solutes that are smaller than a nanometer, this approach permits a wider understanding of NF. It may be difficult to distinguish between NF, RO, and UF procedures, raising doubts about whether NF really needs to be categorized as a distinct technology. It may be argued, in fact, that calling NF “open RO” or “tight UF” won’t significantly alter its uses in recycling or water purification. NF has great potential to improve water quality, lessen water scarcity, and offer long-term desalination and water treatment solutions. The efficiency and effectiveness of NF systems will be further improved by ongoing research and development in membrane technology, confirming their critical role in guaranteeing that everyone on the planet has access to clean and safe water. In conclusion, NF represents state-of-the-art technology that has the ability to revolutionize desalination and water treatment procedures, providing a viable and affordable solution to the world’s water problems.

Keywords: NF system, Membrane technology, Nanometer-sized pores, State-of-the-art, Revolutionize desalination

[This article belongs to International Journal of Environmental Chemistry(ijec)]

How to cite this article: Ali Haider1, Aisha Rafique, Amna Akram, Sadaf Iqbal, Safeer Abbas, Sarmad Yousaf, Sami Ullah, Marva Asghar, Ayesha Saddiqa, Mehnaz Liaqat, Muhammad Kaleem Ullah. A Review on Nano Filtration System. International Journal of Environmental Chemistry. 2024; 10(02):1-4.
How to cite this URL: Ali Haider1, Aisha Rafique, Amna Akram, Sadaf Iqbal, Safeer Abbas, Sarmad Yousaf, Sami Ullah, Marva Asghar, Ayesha Saddiqa, Mehnaz Liaqat, Muhammad Kaleem Ullah. A Review on Nano Filtration System. International Journal of Environmental Chemistry. 2024; 10(02):1-4. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijec/article=2024/view=165542

References

  1. Van der Bruggen, B., Nanofiltration. Encyclopedia of membrane science and technology, 2013: p. 1-23.
  2. Baysal, T., et al., Methanol recovery: potential of nanolaminate organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) membranes. Nanoscale, 2024. 16(7): p. 3393-3416.
  3. Li, J., et al., Polyester nanofiltration membranes for efficient cations separation. Advanced Materials, 2024. 36(9): p. 2309406.
  4. Schaep, J. and C. Vandecasteele, Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of membrane science, 2001. 188(1): p. 129-136.
  5. Oatley-Radcliffe, D.L., et al., Nanofiltration membranes and processes: A review of research trends over the past decade. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2017. 19: p. 164-171.
  6. Eriksson, P., Nanofiltration extends the range of membrane filtration. Environmental progress, 1988. 7(1): p. 58-62.
  7. Yang, S.Y., et al., Nanoporous membranes with ultrahigh selectivity and flux for the filtration of viruses. 2006. 18(6): p. 709-712.
  8. Sadeghi, I., P. Kaner, and A.J.C.o.M. Asatekin, Controlling and expanding the selectivity of filtration membranes. 2018. 30(21): p. 7328-7354.
  9. Uehara, H., et al., Size-selective diffusion in nanoporous but flexible membranes for glucose sensors. 2009. 3(4): p. 924-932.
  10. Boutilier, M.S., et al., Molecular sieving across centimeter-scale single-layer nanoporous graphene membranes. 2017. 11(6): p. 5726-5736.
  11. Park, H.B., et al., Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. 2017. 356(6343): p. eaab0530.
  12. Zhang, Z., et al., Hybrid organic–inorganic–organic isoporous membranes with tunable pore sizes and functionalities for molecular separation. 2021. 33(48): p. 2105251.
  13. Li, H., et al., Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. 2013. 342(6154): p. 95-98.
  14. Verweij, H.J.C.o.i.c.e., Inorganic membranes. 2012. 1(2): p. 156-162.
  15. O’Hern, S.C., et al., Selective ionic transport through tunable subnanometer pores in single-layer graphene membranes. 2014. 14(3): p. 1234-1241.
  16. Adiga, S.P., et al., Nanoporous membranes for medical and biological applications. 2009. 1(5): p. 568-581.
  17. Kanani, D.M., et al., Permeability–selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration: Effect of pore geometry. 2010. 349(1-2): p. 405-410.
  18. Stroeve, P. and N.J.T.i.b. Ileri, Biotechnical and other applications of nanoporous membranes. 2011. 29(6): p. 259-266.
  19. Wafi, M.K., et al., Nanofiltration as a cost-saving desalination process. SN Applied Sciences, 2019. 1(7): p. 751. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0775-y.
  20. Shahmansouri, A. and C. Bellona, Nanofiltration technology in water treatment and reuse: applications and costs. Water Science and Technology, 2015. 71(3): p. 309-319. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2015.015.
  21. Wang, L. and M. Wang, Development and applications of membrane bioreactor technologies. Technical paper presented at, 2008: p. 14-15.
  22. Dixon, R.A., et al., Chemical and Biochemical Technologies for Environmental Infrastructure Sustainability. ” Evolutionary Progress in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM)”, 2023: p. 1-58.
  23. Nadeeshani Nanayakkara, K., et al., Food industry wastewater treatment. Handbook of advanced industrial and hazardous wastes treatment. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010: p. 1233-1254.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 10
Issue 02
Received June 4, 2024
Accepted July 18, 2024
Published August 12, 2024
Views: 35

Check Our other Platform for Workshops in the field of AI, Biotechnology & Nanotechnology.
Learn more
Check Out Platform for Webinars in the field of AI, Biotech. & Nanotech.
Learn more