A Descriptive Study to Assess the Knowledge and Practices Among Staff Nurses Regarding Safe Urine Sample Collection in a Selected Hospital in Delhi, India

Year : 2024 | Volume :02 | Issue : 02 | Page : 14-26
By
vector

Anjali Samson,

vector

Karishma Gautam,

vector

Meena Kumari,

vector

Sadiqa,

vector

Shalini Singh,

  1. Faculty, Department of Mental Health Nursing, Maharaja Agrasen College of Nursing, Haryana, India
  2. Faculty, Department of Nursing, Batra College of Nursing, Delhi, India
  3. Faculty, Department of Nursing, Holy Family College of Nursing, Delhi, India
  4. Nurse Educator, Department of Nursing, Max Hospital, Delhi, India
  5. Clinical Instructor, Department of Nursing, St Stephen College of Nursing, Delhi, India

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_128984’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

Urine collection is a quick diagnostic test to assess kidney function. This study investigates the knowledge and practices of nurses regarding urine sample collection, a fundamental aspect of diagnostic procedures. Urine samples are critical for various tests, yet proper collection techniques are essential to ensure accuracy and prevent contamination. The study’s objectives were (a) To assess the level of knowledge among staff nurses regarding safe urine sample collection, and (b) To observe and record the practice among staff nurses regarding safe urine sample collection Method: The research approach selected for this study was quantitative. The sample of 60 staff nurses’ staff from the wards, casualty/emergency, and intensive care unit (ICU) in Hakeem Abdul Hameed Centenary (HAHC) Hospital, New Delhi, was selected by convenient sampling technique. The instruments used for this study were a structured knowledge questionnaire and an observation checklist. The pilot study was conducted to ascertain the feasibility of the study Result and Conclusion: The result of the study revealed that the majority (96.66%) of nursing staff had poor knowledge (70.50%) had poor practice in random urine collection, The mean practice score for random urine sample collection was 8.41 ± 1.93, (76.60%) nursing staff had poor practice in urine culture and sensitivity. The mean practice score was 8.06 ± 2.07. 69.23% had poor practice scores regarding indwelling catheter urine collection. The mean score of practice regarding indwelling catheter urine collection was 7.53 ± 2.01.

Keywords: Knowledge, practice, staff nurses, safe urine sample collection

[This article belongs to International Journal of Community Health Nursing And Practices (ijchnp)]

How to cite this article:
Anjali Samson, Karishma Gautam, Meena Kumari, Sadiqa, Shalini Singh. A Descriptive Study to Assess the Knowledge and Practices Among Staff Nurses Regarding Safe Urine Sample Collection in a Selected Hospital in Delhi, India. International Journal of Community Health Nursing And Practices. 2024; 02(02):14-26.
How to cite this URL:
Anjali Samson, Karishma Gautam, Meena Kumari, Sadiqa, Shalini Singh. A Descriptive Study to Assess the Knowledge and Practices Among Staff Nurses Regarding Safe Urine Sample Collection in a Selected Hospital in Delhi, India. International Journal of Community Health Nursing And Practices. 2024; 02(02):14-26. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijchnp/article=2024/view=0

Full Text PDF

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_128984’);});Edit

  1. Lombardi G, Sansoni V, Banfi G. Measuring myokines with cardiovascular functions: Pre-analytical variables affecting the analytical output. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:299. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.11, PubMed: 28856139, PubMed Central: PMC5555982.
  2. Favaloro EJ, Oliver S, Mohammed S, Ahuja M, Grzechnik E, Azimulla S, McDonald J, Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G. Potential misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease and haemophilia caused by ineffective mixing of thawed plasma. Haemophilia. 2017;23:e436–43. DOI: 10.1111/hae.13305, PubMed: 28750474.
  3. Burtis CA, Burns DE. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. p. 42–3.
  4. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: Types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1338–42. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344, PubMed: 17525103.
  5. Boone DJ. Governmental perspectives on evaluating laboratory performance. Clin Chem. 1993;39:1461–5; discussion 1466. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/39.7.1461, PubMed: 8330408.
  6. Astion ML, Shojania KG, Hamill TR, Kim S, Ng VL. Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:18–26. DOI: 10.1309/8EXC-CM6Y-R1TH-UBAF, PubMed: 12866368.
  7. Joshy M, Jose M. To assess the knowledge on practice regarding urinary catheter management among staff nurses in selected hospitals in Mangaluru. Eur J Biomed Pharm Sci. 2018;5:416–8.
  8. Arifin NB. Knowledge and compliance among staff nurses in collecting urine culture from patients on indwelling catheter in a medical ward. Malays J Nurs. 2022;14:43–50.
  9. Lakmali SR. Nurses’ knowledge on urine specimen collection and storage for laboratory testing at a selected hospital in Colombo District, Sri Lanka. In: The International Nursing Congress; University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, Colombo. Peradeniya: University of Peradeniya; 2018.
  10. Dadam R. A study to assess the knowledge regarding collection of urine specimen for infants among staff nurses and nursing students in NMCH, Nellore. Int J Appl Res. 2017;3:187–9.
  11. Letica-Kriegel AS, Salmasian H, Vawdrey DK, Youngerman BE, Green RA, Furuya EY, Calfee DP, Perotte R. Identifying the risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A large cross-sectional study of six hospitals. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e022137. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022137, PubMed: 30796114.

Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 02
Issue 02
Received 11/08/2024
Accepted 24/10/2024
Published 12/11/2024