Editorial: Advancements in Movement Analysis for Understanding Neurological Disorders

Year : 2024 | Volume :01 | Issue : 02 | Page : 24-28
By

Carozzo Simone,

  1. Researcher, S. Anna Institute, Crotone, Italy

Abstract

Neurological disorders pose a significant challenge, demanding innovative approaches for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and deeper understanding. Movement analysis emerges as a powerful tool, offering a quantitative window into the complexities of motor function. This editorial delves into the transformative impact of movement analysis on neurological research and clinical practice. Traditional diagnostic methods, reliant on subjective observations, often miss subtle motor impairments, particularly in early disease stages. Movement analysis tackles this challenge by capturing nuanced abnormalities in gait, balance, and coordination, enabling early detection and intervention. Furthermore, it provides a standardized framework for monitoring disease progression, treatment efficacy, and potential side effects, crucial for effective disease management. Beyond diagnosis and monitoring, movement analysis offers insights into the underlying pathophysiology of neurological disorders. By correlating characteristic movement patterns with neural correlates, researchers gain valuable knowledge about disease etiology, paving the way for targeted therapies. The convergence of wearable sensor technology, motion tracking systems, and machine learning techniques has transformed the field of movement analysis. This transformation has made it more widely available, economical, and insightful. Such progress offers significant potential for enhancing our knowledge of neurological conditions and bettering the health results of patients.. In conclusion, movement analysis stands as a beacon of hope, offering unparalleled insights into the nervous system. By embracing this quantitative paradigm, we can enhance diagnostic accuracy, objectively monitor disease progression, unveil underlying pathophysiology, and bridge the gap between research and clinical practice.

Keywords: Movement analysis, Neurological disorders, Gait analysis, Machine learning, Diagnosis, Rehabilitation

[This article belongs to International Journal of Brain Sciences(ijbs)]

How to cite this article: Carozzo Simone. Editorial: Advancements in Movement Analysis for Understanding Neurological Disorders. International Journal of Brain Sciences. 2024; 01(02):24-28.
How to cite this URL: Carozzo Simone. Editorial: Advancements in Movement Analysis for Understanding Neurological Disorders. International Journal of Brain Sciences. 2024; 01(02):24-28. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijbs/article=2024/view=156001

References

  1. Portnoy S, Maayan C, Tsenter J, Ofran Y, Goldman V, Hiller N, Karniel N, Schwartz I. Characteristics of ataxic gait in familial dysautonomia patients. PloS one. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0196599.
  2. Suzuki T, Ito Y, Ito T, Kidokoro H, Noritake K, Tsujimura K, Saitoh S, Yamamoto H, Ochi N, Ishihara N, Yasui I. Pathological gait in Rett syndrome: Quantitative evaluation using three-dimensional gait analysis. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 2023 Jan 1;42:15-21.
  3. Wren TA, Tucker CA, Rethlefsen SA, Gorton III GE, Õunpuu S. Clinical efficacy of instrumented gait analysis: Systematic review 2020 update. Gait & posture. 2020 Jul 1;80:274-9.
  4. Moevus A, Mignotte M, de Guise JA, Meunier J. A perceptual map for gait symmetry quantification and pathology detection. Biomedical engineering online. 2015 Dec;14:1-24.
  5. Keene DJ, Willett K, Lamb SE. The effects of ankle supports on gait in adults: A randomized cross-over study. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2015 Dec 1;25(6):973-81.
  6. Filtjens B, Ginis P, Nieuwboer A, Afzal MR, Spildooren J, Vanrumste B, Slaets P. Modelling and identification of characteristic kinematic features preceding freezing of gait with convolutional neural networks and layer-wise relevance propagation. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2021 Dec;21:1-1.
  7. Matsuda F, Mukaino M, Ohtsuka K, Tanikawa H, Tsuchiyama K, Teranishi T, Kanada Y, Kagaya H, Saitoh E. Biomechanical factors behind toe clearance during the swing phase in hemiparetic patients. Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 2017 Apr 3;24(3):177-82.
  8. Celik Y, Stuart S, Woo WL, Godfrey A. Gait analysis in neurological populations: Progression in the use of wearables. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2021 Jan 1;87:9-29.
  9. Kidziński Ł, Yang B, Hicks JL, Rajagopal A, Delp SL, Schwartz MH. Deep neural networks enable quantitative movement analysis using single-camera videos. Nature communications. 2020 Aug 13;11(1):4054.
  10. Bowman T, Gervasoni E, Arienti C, Lazzarini SG, Negrini S, Crea S, Cattaneo D, Carrozza MC. Wearable devices for biofeedback rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis to design application rules and estimate the effectiveness on balance and gait outcomes in neurological diseases. Sensors. 2021 May 15;21(10):3444.
  11. Cimolin V, Galli M. Summary measures for clinical gait analysis: A literature review. Gait & posture. 2014 Apr 1;39(4):1005-10.
  12. Castagneri C, Agostini V, Rosati S, Balestra G, Knaflitz M. Asymmetry index in muscle activations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2019 Mar 7;27(4):772-9.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 01
Issue 02
Received March 11, 2024
Accepted June 28, 2024
Published July 11, 2024
Views: 44