Advances in Biopolymer Based Nanocomposite Materials for Food Packaging Applications

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | 03 | Page : –
    By

    Arun Kumar Kashyap,

  • Nikita Kashyap,

  • Rohit Kumar Bargah,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Govt. E Raghavendra Rao PG. Science College, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, School of Studies of Engineering and Technology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
  3. Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Chemistry and Research Centre, Govt. S.P.M. College, Sitapur, Surguja, Chhattisgarh, India

Abstract

This Article provides an in-depth exploration of the recent innovations in biopolymer-based food packaging, highlighting natural materials like starches and proteins, as well as synthetic biopolymers such as polylactic acid (PLA). With the escalating global concerns about environmental degradation and the detrimental effects of plastic waste, there has been a growing emphasis on finding eco-friendly, biodegradable substitutes to reduce plastic pollution and dependence on fossil fuels. Among the biopolymer alternatives, starch and protein-based materials are drawing attention for their renewability, biodegradability, and non-toxic nature. Starches, for example, are abundant, inexpensive, and can be sourced from various plant-based raw materials, while proteins can offer unique functionalities such as enhanced water resistance and film-forming properties. On the other hand, synthetic biopolymers like PLA, derived from renewable plant resources like corn, provide durability and versatility while being compostable, making them a viable replacement for conventional plastics in food packaging. The development of biopolymer blends and nanocomposites is another key area of focus. By combining different biopolymers or incorporating nanomaterials such as nanoparticles, these blends and composites can achieve enhanced mechanical strength, improved barrier properties, and better moisture resistance, which are crucial for food packaging applications.  This review brings together insights into the various types of biopolymer packaging materials, their properties, production processes, and applications. By exploring the potential of these materials, the paper highlights their ability to revolutionize the food packaging industry, offering both environmental sustainability and functional improvements over traditional plastic packaging. With increasing research and industrial interest, biopolymer-based packaging holds great promise for addressing critical environmental issues, offering a more sustainable, biodegradable, and eco-friendly solution to food packaging in the near future.

Keywords: Plastics, Biopolymers, Bio-nanocomposites, Biodegradable packaging

aWQ6MjA5NTU4fGZpbGVuYW1lOmNjMGE2ZDY4LWZpLXBuZy53ZWJwfHNpemU6dGh1bWJuYWls
How to cite this article:
Arun Kumar Kashyap, Nikita Kashyap, Rohit Kumar Bargah. Advances in Biopolymer Based Nanocomposite Materials for Food Packaging Applications. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(03):-.
How to cite this URL:
Arun Kumar Kashyap, Nikita Kashyap, Rohit Kumar Bargah. Advances in Biopolymer Based Nanocomposite Materials for Food Packaging Applications. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=209564


References

  1. Garlotta DA. Literature review of poly lactic acid. J Polym Environ. 2001;9 (2):63-84.
  2. Tharanathan RN. Biodegradable films and composite coatings: past, present and future. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2003;14 (3):71-8.
  3. Auras R, Harte B, Selke S. An overview of polylactides as packaging materials. Macromol Biosci. 2003;4 (9):835-64.
  4. Jahangir S, Leber MJ. Biodegradable food packaging: an environmental imperative. Industry report. 2007;1-20.
  5. Rhim J-W, Hong S-I, Park H-M, Ng PK. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-based nanocomposite films with antimicrobial activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54: 5814-22.
  6. Zeng QH, Yu AB, Lu GQ, Paul DR. Clay-based polymer nanocomposites: research and commercial development. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2005;5: 1574-92.
  7. Fornes TD, Paul DR. Modeling properties of nylon/clay nanocomposites using composite theories. Polymer. 2003:44 (17):4993-5013.
  8. Díaz-Montes E, Castro-Muñoz R. Edible Films and Coatings as Food-Quality Preservers: An Overview. Foods. 2021 Jan 26: 10 (2):249. doi: 10.3390/foods10020249. PMID: 33530469; PMCID: PMC7912451.
  9. Fratzl P, Gupta HS, Paschalis EP, Roschger P. Structure and mechanical quality of the collagen-mineral nano-composite in bone. J Mater Chem. 2004;14(14):2115-2123.
  10. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003: 423:337-42.
  11. Zhao RX, Torley P, Halley PJ. Emerging biodegradable materials: starch- and protein-based bionanocomposites. J Mater Sci. 2008; 43: 3058-71.
  12. Cabedo L, Gimenez E, Lagaron JM, Gavara R, Saura JJ. Development of EVOH/kaolinite nanocomposites. Polymer. 2004;45:5233-8.
  13. Rhim JW, Hong SI, Ha CS. Tensile, water vapor barrier and antimicrobial properties of PLA/nanoclay composite films. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2009;42(2):612-7.
  14. Yu J, Cui G, Wei M, Huang J. Facile exfoliation of rectorite nanoplatelets in soy protein matrix and reinforced bionanocomposites thereof. J Appl Polym Sci. 2007;104(5):3367-77.
  15. Pokharel A, Falua KJ, Babaei-Ghazvini A, Acharya B. Biobased Polymer Composites: A Review. Journal of Composites Science. 2022; 6(9):255. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6090255.
  16. Lertwimolnun W, Vergnes B. Influence of screw profile and extrusion conditions on the microstructure of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci. 2007;47(12):2100-2109.
  17. Shaikh S, Yaqoob M, Aggarwal P. An overview of biodegradable packaging in food industry. Curr Res Food Sci. 2021 Jul 30;4: 503-520.
  18. Modi SJ. Assessing the feasibility of poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-valerate) (PHBV) and poly-(lactic acid) for potential food packaging applications [thesis]. Ohio: Ohio State University; 2010.
  19. Rasal RM, Janorkar AV, Hirt DE. Poly (lactic acid) modifications. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35: 338-356.
  20. Raquez JM, Habibi Y, Murariu M, Dubois P. Progress in bionanocomposites: from green plastics to biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2013; 38(11):1504-1542.
  21. Vroman I, Tighzer TL. Biodegradable polymers. Materials. 2009; 2 (2):307-44.
  22. Lemes AP, Montanheiro TLA, Passador FR, Durán N. Nanocomposites of polyhydroxyalkanoates reinforced with carbon nanotubes: chemical and biological properties. Eco-friendly Polymer Nanocomposites. Springer, India. 2015;75:79-108.
  23. Gorrasi G, Tortora M, Vittoria V, Pollet E, Alexendre M, Dubois P. Physical properties of poly(ε-caprolactone) layered silicate nanocomposites prepared by controlled grafting polymerization. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 2004; 42(8):1466-1475.
  24. Ahmed J, Varhney SK, Auras R, Hwang SW. Thermal and rheological properties of L-polylactide/polyethylene glycol/silicate nanocomposites films. J Food Sci. 2010; 75:97-108.
  25. Charles A, Kao HM, Huang TC. Physical investigations of surface membrane–water relationship of intact and gelatinized wheat–starch systems. Carbohydr Res. 2003;338(22):2403-8.
  26. Cyras VP, Manfredi LB, Ton MT, Vazquez A. Physical and mechanical properties of thermoplastic starch/montmorillonite nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym. 2008; 73(1):55-63.
  27. Rein DM, Khalfin R, Cohen Y. Cellulose as a novel amphiphilic coating for oil-in-water and water-in-oil dispersions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012; 386(1):456-63.
  28. Mm Xu Y, Wu Z, Li A, Chen N, Rao J, Zeng Q. Nanocellulose Composite Films in Food Packaging Materials: A Review. Polymers. 2024; 16(3):423.
  29. Burdock GA. Safety assessment of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as a food ingredient. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45(12):2341-51.
  30. De Moura MR, Avena RJ, McHugh TH, Krochta JM, Mattoso LHC. Properties of novel hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films containing chitosan nanoparticles. J Food Sci. 2008; 73(7):31-37.
  31. Kaur, G., Sharma, S., Mir, S.A. et al. Nanobiocomposite Films: a “Greener Alternate” for Food Packaging. Food Bioprocess Technol 14, 1013–1027 (2021).
  32. Maxwell EG, Belshaw NJ, Waldron KW, Morris VJ. Pectin – an emerging new bioactive food polysaccharide. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2012; 24:64-73.
  33. Sriamornsak P, Kennedy RA. Swelling and diffusion studies of calcium polysaccharide gels intended for film coating. Int J Pharm. 2008;358(1-2):205-13.
  34. Monfregola L, Bugatti V, Amodeo P, De Luca S, Vittoria V. Physical and water sorption properties of chemically modified pectin with an environmentally friendly process. Biomacromolecules. 2011; 12(6):2311-2318.
  35. Shankar S, Reddy JP, Rhim JW, Kim HY. Preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of chitin nanofibrils reinforced carrageenan nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym. 2015; 117:468-75.
  36. Hosseini SF, Rezaei M, Zandi M, Farahmand F. Development of bioactive fish gelatin/chitosan nanoparticles composite films with antimicrobial properties. Food Chem. 2016; 194:1266-1274.
  37. Chaudhary V, Small DM, Kasapis S. Structural studies on matrices of deacylated gellan with polydextrose. Food Chem. 2013;137(4):37-44.
  38. Mun S, Kim HC, Yadave M, Kim J. Graphene oxide–gellan gum–sodium alginate nanocomposites: synthesis, characterization, and mechanical behavior. Compos Interfaces. 2015; 22(4):249-263.
  39. Staroszczyk H, Pielichowska J, Sztuka K, Stangret J, Kołodziejska I. Molecular and

structural characteristics of cod gelatin films modified with EDC and TGase. Food Chem. 2012; 130(2):335-43.

  1. Qazanfarzadeh Z, Kadivar M. Properties of whey protein isolate nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose isolated from oat husk. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016; 91:1134-1140.
  2. Tian H, Xu G, Yang B, Guo G. Microstructure and mechanical properties of soy protein/agar blend films: effect of composition and processing methods. J Food Eng. 2011;107(1):21-6.
  3. Wang Y, Xiong YL, Rentfrow KG, Newman MC. Oxidation promotes cross-linking but impairs film-forming properties of whey proteins. J Food Eng. 2013; 115(1):11-9.
  4. Ramos ÓL, Silva SI, Soares JC, Fernandes JC, Poças MF, Pintado ME, et al. Features and performance of edible films, obtained from whey protein isolate formulated with antimicrobial compounds. Food Res Int. 2012; 45(1):351-61.
  5. Reddy N, Yang Y. Novel green composites using zein as matrix and jute fibers as reinforcement. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011; 35(8):3496-503.
  6. Sarker A, Mondal SC, Ahmmed R, Rana J, Waheda Rahman Ansary M, Bilal M. 16 – Prospects and challenges of polymer nanocomposites for innovative food packaging. In: Ali N, Bilal M, Khan A, Nguyen TA, Gupta RKBTSPN, editors. Micro and Nano Technologies [Internet]. Elsevier; 2023. p. 355–77.
  7. Ozcalik O, Tihminlioglu F. Barrier properties of corn zein nanocomposite coated polypropylene films for food packaging applications. J Food Eng. 2013; 114(4):505-513.
  8. Mishra B, Panda J, Mishra AK, Nath PC, Nayak PK, Mahapatra U, et al. Recent advances in sustainable biopolymer-based nanocomposites for smart food packaging: A review. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2024;279:135583.
  9. Lim CSS, Soon CY, Chan EWC, Wong CW. 10 – Nanofillers to enhance biodegradable composites and their niche applications. In: Nurazzi NM, Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Khalina ABTS and NN in PC, editors. Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering [Internet]. Woodhead Publishing; 2023. p. 215–57.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 13
03
Received 13/02/2025
Accepted 30/04/2025
Published 05/05/2025
Publication Time 81 Days
Total Visits: 52


My IP

PlumX Metrics