Md Tahfizur Rahman,
Rahul Chaubey,
- Post Graduate, Department of Zoology, Millat College, LNMU, Darbhanga, Bihar, India
- Project Research Scientist II, Kala-Azar Medical Research Center, Rambagh, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India
Abstract
Sericin is a by-product of the silk industry, has gained attention for its bioactive properties and ability to scavenge free radicals for protecting cells from oxidative damage and different climatic conditions may influence the biochemical properties of the sericin. Thus, present study aims to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of tasar sericin extracted from silkworms reared in diverse ecological regions of India. South Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha are different ecological regions notable for their tasar silk production in India, each representing unique climatic and environmental conditions. Sericin samples were extracted using a standardized protocol, and their antioxidant activity was assessed through DPPH, ABTS, and FRAPS assays. Antimicrobial efficacy was analyzed against the most common pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. Analysis shows significant variations in antioxidant and antimicrobial potential across ecological regions, suggesting a correlation between the environmental conditions and the bioactive properties of tasar sericin.
Keywords: Tasar Sericin, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Eco-regions, Bioactivity, DPPH, FRAP, Pathogens
Md Tahfizur Rahman, Rahul Chaubey. Comparative Analysis of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Tasar Sericin from Different Ecological regions of India. Research and Reviews : A Journal of Life Sciences. 2025; 15(01):-.
Md Tahfizur Rahman, Rahul Chaubey. Comparative Analysis of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Tasar Sericin from Different Ecological regions of India. Research and Reviews : A Journal of Life Sciences. 2025; 15(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjols/article=2025/view=0
References
- Kaplan, D. L., Dash, R., Dash, B. C., and Kundu, S. C. (2008). Potential medicinal and biotechnological uses for silkworm-bioengineered sericin, a natural protective glue protein, Progress in Polymer Science, 33(10), 998–1012.
- Aramwit, P., Siritientong, T., &Srichana, T. (2012). Potential applications of silk sericin, a natural protein from textile industry by-products. Waste Management & Research, 30(3), 217-234.
- Reddy, N., & Yang, Y. (2011). Silk sericin and its applications: A review. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 22(8), 797-815.
- Wongputtaraksa, N., Panpisut, P., &Aramwit, P. (2016). Anti-aging properties of silk sericin: A review of in vitro and in vivo studies. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 15(2), 193-202.
- Dhawan, S., Singh, R., & Ahlawat, T. (2012). Antimicrobial activity of silk sericin and its application as a natural preservative. Food Biotechnology, 26(4), 345-360.
- Das, S., & Gupta, R. (2013). Impact of eco-regional factors on the molecular structure of Tasar sericin. Silkworm Biotechnology Journal, 28(2), 112-119.
- Gupta, P., Singh, N., & Sharma, V. (2018). Comparative analysis of antioxidant properties of mulberry and Tasar sericin. Journal of Sericulture Science, 50(3), 187-193.
- Sinha, R., & Choudhary, K. (2020). Influence of environmental conditions on the antioxidant activity of Tasar sericin. Environmental Biotechnology Journal, 35(1), 23-31.
- Roy, A., & Bose, S. (2017). Antimicrobial potential of non-mulberry silk sericin: A study on Tasar silkworm. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(4), 1595-1603.
- Patil, A., & Kulkarni, R. (2021). Eco-regional influences on the antimicrobial efficacy of Tasar sericin. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science, 49(2), 289-299.
- Verma, S., & Sharma, P. (2019). A review on the regional influences on the properties of Tasar silk. Journal of Silk Science and Technology, 37(4), 315-326.
- Singh, T., & Gupta, M. (2022). Comparative study of bioactive properties of Tasar sericin from different Indian eco-regions. Biomaterial Research Journal, 29(2), 209-218.

Research and Reviews : A Journal of Life Sciences
| Volume | 15 |
| 01 | |
| Received | 08/01/2025 |
| Accepted | 04/02/2025 |
| Published | 21/02/2025 |
| Publication Time | 44 Days |
async function fetchCitationCount(doi) {
let apiUrl = `https://api.crossref.org/works/${doi}`;
try {
let response = await fetch(apiUrl);
let data = await response.json();
let citationCount = data.message[“is-referenced-by-count”];
document.getElementById(“citation-count”).innerText = `Citations: ${citationCount}`;
} catch (error) {
console.error(“Error fetching citation count:”, error);
document.getElementById(“citation-count”).innerText = “Citations: Data unavailable”;
}
}
fetchCitationCount(“10.37591/RRJOLS.v15i01.0”);
