Pedagogical Innovations and Student Voices: A Longitudinal Examination of Engagement in Elementary Schools

Open Access

Year : 2024 | Volume : | : | Page : –
By

Sharifah Ibrahim Alghamdi,

  1. Assistant Professor, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

From 2023 to 2024, this mixed-approaches longitudinal study follows students of varying ages to see how characteristics related to emotional and social development, curriculum flexibility, and innovative teaching methods affect their engagement and performance in the classroom. Educators and students are followed for one year in this study to see how educational approaches change and impact students’ learning. For this study, researchers conducted a one-time survey of a sizable group of teachers and students to compile quantitative data on topics such as classroom climate, student engagement, technological resources, and the prevalence of creative pedagogy. Key aspects of child-centered learning and emotional and social development were identified through factor analysis, and patterns across time were studied through longitudinal analysis. Qualitative data was gathered through task-based classroom observations, teacher interviews, and student focus groups. Recurring themes concerning the efficacy of pedagogical approaches and the significance of social and emotional support in encouraging student engagement were uncovered via the use of thematic analysis. The study found that curricular flexibility and creative teaching methods significantly boosted students’ involvement and academic performance. When paired with an environment that fosters kids’ social and emotional development, this becomes much more evident. Combining quantitative and qualitative data is required to fully understand the interplay between these factors and how they affect learning results. Educators and policymakers can use the data to inform their pursuit of better teaching practices and the promotion of students’ holistic development across age groups.

Keywords: Teaching methods, 21st Century learners, education technology, flexible curriculum, holistic education, student engagement

How to cite this article:
Sharifah Ibrahim Alghamdi. Pedagogical Innovations and Student Voices: A Longitudinal Examination of Engagement in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2024; ():-.
How to cite this URL:
Sharifah Ibrahim Alghamdi. Pedagogical Innovations and Student Voices: A Longitudinal Examination of Engagement in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Education Sciences. 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijes/article=2024/view=176418


Full Text PDF

References

  1. Morrow V. Understanding children and childhood. Centre for Children and Young People: Background Briefing Series. 2011;1.
  2. Matthews SH. A window on the ‘new’ sociology of childhood. Sociol Compass. 2007 Sep;1(1):322-34.
  3. Federle KH. Rights flow downhill. Int J Child Rights. 1994;2:343.
  4. Devine D. Voicing concerns about children’s rights and status in school. In: Greene S, editor. Encouraging Voices: Respecting the Insights of Young People Who Have Been Marginalized. Dublin: National Disability Authority; 2003. p. 36-57.
  5. Bold beginnings: The Reception curriculum in a sample of good and outstanding primary schools. November, No 170045. 2017 Oct 30.
  6. Greene S, Hill M. Researching children’s experience: methods and methodological issues. In: Greene S, Hogan D, editors. Researching Children’s Experience, Approaches and Methods. London: Sage; 2005. p. 1-21.
  7. Corsaro WA, Everitt JG. The sociology of childhood. Sage publications; 2023 Dec 20.
  8. MacNaughton G, Hughes P, Smith K. Young children’s rights and public policy: Practices and possibilities for citizenship in the early years. Children & Society. 2007 Nov;21(6):458-69.
  9. Flutter J, Rudduck J. Consulting pupils: What’s in it for schools? Routledge; 2004 Mar 4.
  10. Kellett M. Engaging with children and young people. Centre for Children and Young People: Background Briefing Series. Southern Cross University, Falmer Press; 2011;3.
  11. Woodhead M. Childhood studies: past, present and future. In: Kehily MJ, editor. An Introduction to Childhood Studies. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2009. p. 17-33.
  12. Nutbrown C, Clough P. Citizenship and inclusion in the early years: understanding and responding to children’s perspectives on ‘belonging’. International Journal of Early Years Education. 2009 Oct 1;17(3):191-206.
  13. Moss P, Dahlberg G, Pence A. Getting beyond the problem with quality. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 2000 Jan 1;8(2):103-15.
  14. Siraj‐Blatchford* I, Sylva K. Researching pedagogy in English pre‐schools. british educational research Journal. 2004 Sep 1;30(5):713-30.
  15. Taguchi HL. Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. Routledge; 2009 Sep 10.
  16. Moyles J, Adams S, Musgrove A. SPEEL study of pedagogical effectiveness. Research Report 363. Department for Education and Skills; 2002.
  17. Stephen C. Pedagogy: The silent partner in early years learning. Early years. 2010 Mar 1;30(1):15-28.
  18. Rinaldi C. In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. Routledge; 2021 Oct 28.
  19. Formosinho J, Oliveira-Formosinho J. Childhood Association’s Pedagogical Approach. Lisbon: Aga Khan Foundation; 2008.
  20. Roberts-Holmes G. ‘It’s the bread and butter of our practice’: experiencing the Early Years Foundation Stage. International Journal of Early Years Education. 2012 Mar 1;20(1):30-42.
  21. Department for Education. Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage: setting the standards for learning, development and care for children from birth to five, 2017.
  22. Rogoff B. Cognition as a collaborative process. In: Kuhn D, Siegler RS, editors. Handbook of Child Psychology. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley; 1998. p. 679-744.
  23. Ang L. Preschool or prep school? Rethinking the role of early years education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. 2014 Jun;15(2):185-99.
  24. Genishi C, Dyson AH. Children, language, and literacy: Diverse learners in diverse times. Teachers College Press; 2015 Apr 18.
  25. Arnot M, Reay D. A sociology of pedagogic voice: Power, inequality and pupil consultation. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education. 2007 Sep 1;28(3):311-25.
  26. Bernstein B. The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Routledge; 2004 Nov 23.
  27. Mayes E, Finneran R, Black R. The challenges of student voice in primary schools: Students ‘having a voice’and ‘speaking for’others. Australian Journal of Education. 2019 Aug;63(2):157-72.
  28. Donegan A, Devine D, Martinez‐Sainz G, Symonds J, Sloan S. Children as co‐researchers in pandemic times: Power and participation in the use of digital dialogues with children during the COVID‐19 lockdown. Children & Society. 2023 Jan;37(1):235-53.
  29. Luttrell W. ‘A camera is a big responsibility’: A lens for analysing children’s visual voices. Visual studies. 2010 Dec 1;25(3):224-37.
  30. Bron J, Veugelers W. Why we need to involve our students in curriculum design: Five arguments for student voice. Curriculum and teaching dialogue. 2014;16(1/2):125.
  31. Quinn S, Owen S. Digging deeper: Understanding the power of ‘student voice’. Australian Journal of Education. 2016 Apr;60(1):60-72.
  32. McGillicuddy D, Devine D. ‘You feel ashamed that you are not in the higher group’—Children’s psychosocial response to ability grouping in primary school. British Educational Research Journal. 2020 Jun;46(3):553-73.
  33. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). Aistear: The Early Childhood Curriculum Framework. Dublin: NCCA; 2009.
  34. European Agency for Development in Inclusive and Special Education. Teacher education for inclusion (TE4I): key policy messages. 2011
  35. Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: United Nations; 1989.
  36. Cook-Sather A. Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum inquiry. 2006 Dec 1;36(4):359-90.
  37. Lundy L, Cook-Sather A. Children’s rights and student voice: Their intersections and the implications for curriculum and pedagogy. The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. 2015 Dec 3:263-77.
  38. Lodge C. Engaging student voice to improve pedagogy and learning: An exploration of examples of innovative pedagogical approaches for school improvement. Int J Pedagog Learn. 2008;4(5):4-19.
  39. Mesquita C. Children’s Voice in Praxiological Transformation. In Establishing Child Centred Practice in a Changing World, Part B 2023 Jun 9 (pp. 23-37). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  40. Watson K, Newman L. Children’s voices: Inclusive early childhood placemaking with children. Journal of Early Childhood Research. 2024 Jun;22(2):258-71.
Ahead of Print Open Access Original Research
Volume
Received September 4, 2024
Accepted September 5, 2024
Published September 30, 2024
Views: 54

Check Our other Platform for Workshops in the field of AI, Biotechnology & Nanotechnology.
Learn more
Check Out Platform for Webinars in the field of AI, Biotech. & Nanotech.
Learn more